1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Suarez challenge

Discussion in 'Tottenham Hotspur' started by Le God, Feb 6, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Page_Moss_Kopite

    Page_Moss_Kopite Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    34,977
    Likes Received:
    9,295
    By all means have a rant about it but dont get religion and racism mixed up.
     
    #101
  2. <ok>

    Appreciated this greatly. Certainly more constructive than your moderator's comment (see above)!

    You're a credit to Liverpool FC.
     
    #102
  3. remembercolinlee

    remembercolinlee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2012
    Messages:
    33,481
    Likes Received:
    36,866
    You really need help... Seriously...
    You dream up any excuse you want to justify the disgraceful of Suarez (its cultural) the embaressment of your manager and players defending the indefensable (we can show our player that we know he's innocent) the outragous treatment of the oldham player (prove it...its a media conspiracy) the scum
    bloke doing monkey noises at evra (well its banter innit)....give it a ****ing rest ....there aint no conspiracy just a twat footballer who made racist comments... get over it ....but dont make comments about our clubs jewish links and then claim you could make a false racism claim against us (like the nasty evra man did against the poor suarez lad)... Your pityful self whinging is pathetic.
     
    #103
  4. charmingmikeylfc

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    222
    Likes Received:
    7
    A very interesting read. Bringing religion into football is non-sensical as is Davidako's attempts at highlighting Suarez's race-case through the quoting of misguided, anti-jewish, websites. I can kind of see Davidako's point but he puts it across in a MASSIVELY bad way. I hope he's trying to say "Racism can be read through very tenuous links if you are that way inclined".
    In some ways I'm glad he riled you as I now know more than I did about a faith I was reasonably naive about. Good Article.
     
    #104
  5. I haven't. Notice how I didn't describe Davidako as a 'racist' once in said rant. My point WAS about religion, and religion ONLY. He has portrayed my religion in a needlessly negative light, and I felt the need to take a stand and clear the waters.

    In my opinion, Davidako is not a racist, he's simply mis-informed and displayed poor judgement through his comments.
    There's a big difference between the two- the former would have him banned from Not606. The latter is perfectly legal, but requires a response from those affected by his misinformation...
     
    #105
  6. Bozz

    Bozz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,999
    Likes Received:
    30
    Liverpool FC mods cannot moderate this topic as it's primary forum is on the Tottenham forum. With this in mind can you please remove it from the Liverpool forum as I do not like the idea of a Liverpool/Tottenham topic on our forum that we cannot moderate.

    If you still feel that this has a place on the Liverpool forum, Can you please post it again only on the Liverpool forum so the moderation team can moderate the article

    Thanks,

    Bozz
     
    #106
  7. luvgonzo

    luvgonzo Pisshead

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    102,249
    Likes Received:
    60,471
    I don't think this is the place for your rant. If you have a problem with Davidako PM your mod.
     
    #107
  8. Sorry. I stand corrected. I initially wrote 'racially inciting comments' at the beginning of the post, and have amended accordingly. To clarify, I hadn't meant to call Davidako 'a racist'- I don't believe he is one. I began the post in this way to highlight the fact that comments such as his can- and often do- have a knock-on affect of increasing racial tension and enmity, hence "racially inciting".

    I apologise unreservedly if this was interpreted to be labelling Davidako as a racist, as I hadn't intended that in the slightest!
     
    #108
  9. Incorrect.

    See above. I don't have a problem with Davidako himself. For all I know he's/she's a lovely bloke/lady. I had a problem with some of his comments which- MADE PUBLICLY- warranted a PUBLIC response, not a PM!
     
    #109
  10. Page_Moss_Kopite

    Page_Moss_Kopite Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    34,977
    Likes Received:
    9,295
    I cant be arsed with the topic but your not very clever editing the word "racist" out of your OP before replying to my post.

    <doh>
     
    #110

  11. humanbeingincroydon

    humanbeingincroydon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2011
    Messages:
    63,619
    Likes Received:
    28,260
    "Grossly insensitive" or "grossly misinformed" are both closer to the truth, and acceptable in this context.
     
    #111
  12. Billy The Spur

    Billy The Spur Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    3,038
    Likes Received:
    1,910
    Without doubt dirty Suarez should have been red carded for his intentional kick of Parkers stomach. Also the other Mouser who put in a leg breaking tackle on Parker, cant remember who (may have been Skrtel). But how many Mousers ever get sent off at Klanfield?
     
    #112
  13. Le God

    Le God Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2011
    Messages:
    734
    Likes Received:
    1
    It wasn't clear at all. As the creator of the thread I've been keeping track of the response and must say I see you as possibly anti-jewish but certainly incredibly stupid. I myself am non-religius , I suppose I am Agnostic. That being said I found your comments out of order and unnecessary.
     
    #113
  14. Cheers <ok>

    Another credit to LFC.
     
    #114
  15. Written 4 minutes before your kind 'observation':

    <doh>

    Right back at ya...
     
    #115
  16. Spurf

    Spurf Thread Mover
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    23,176
    Likes Received:
    13,470
    Can we get back to football, people of religion are very sensitive about their faiths and are unlikely to be moved by any arguments that can be put to them here. All it will do is stir up ill feeling and we have the football for that.

    Thanks <ok>
     
    #116
  17. Sir_Red

    Sir_Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    9,326
    Likes Received:
    687
    Amen

    Edit: no irony intended...
     
    #117
  18. Whether it was or wasn't is utterly irrelevant. What is relevant is that you publicly cited a number of falsified and quite obviously potentially harmful comments which required addressing.

    Despite being an adherent of "logic, evidence and humanity", your comments displayed little logic, a lack of respect for the sensitivities of other members of humanity, and as for your apparent "evidence"...the less said about this the better!

    So, who's the bigger 'retard'? He who loyally and thoughtfully follows beliefs which have survived millennia, or he who purports to be "logical, humanist and evidence-based", when the reality of the situation reveals him to be little more than a hypocrite cowering behind vague and pompous words which he himself knows not the meaning of?
     
    #118
  19. Spurf

    Spurf Thread Mover
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    23,176
    Likes Received:
    13,470
    Postiga did you see my request?
     
    #119
  20. I did. And I chose to ignore it just this once. I feel vindicated, and thank you all for your time & patience.
     
    #120
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page