1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Stoke City’s Peter Crouch could face FA ban for eye-gouging incident

Discussion in 'Stoke City' started by StokieSmit, Jan 24, 2012.

  1. StokieSmit

    StokieSmit Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    434
    Likes Received:
    10
    The striker may be suspended for three games following the incident with West Brom's Jonas Olsson during Saturday's 2-1 defeat to Roy Hodgson's side at the Britannia.

    Stoke City striker Peter Crouch could face a three-game suspension for violent conduct if he is found guilty of eye-gouging West Brom’s Jonas Olsson, according to The Daily Mirror.

    The FA have decided to take a closer look at the TV evidence surrounding the heated argument between Crouch and Olsson in West Brom’s 2-1 win over Stoke at the weekend.

    The former Tottenham striker could be punished with a charge of violent conduct after cameras appeared to show him push his fingers towards the Swedish defender’s right eye after Stoke had a penalty appeal waved away.

    After the game, incensed Baggies fans took to Twitter and voiced their outrage at the incident, calling for the FA to take action after Crouch went unpunished by the referee Anthony Taylor during the game.

    If the Stoke target man is found guilty he will miss the FA Cup tie with Derby County on Saturday, before games against Manchester United and Sunderland.



    I have no recollection of this at all. I cannot remember any incident involving Crouch and Olsson, so I hope it's just paper talk. Mind you, it might give someone else a go at the weekend...
     
    #1
  2. The Welsh Mourinho

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    0
    He should get a ban, to be honest. Stupid thing to do.

    [video=youtube;66_A9HWy6Ag]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66_A9HWy6Ag[/video]
     
    #2
  3. THe Mighty Huth Rocks

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2011
    Messages:
    3,824
    Likes Received:
    4
    Well going off that short clip, it did look intentional too me, silly ****.

    Oh well, at least it mean Jerome starting.
     
    #3
  4. nickyb

    nickyb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2011
    Messages:
    30,245
    Likes Received:
    24,045
    Yup me too, as a rugby man, I have seen too much of that, the normal ban is between 6 and 8 games.
    However - that is NOT a gouge.

    In rugby terminology it is - inappropriate contact with the eyes - same thing in essence, but a world apart from an actual gouge.

    Bottom line, if you use your hands near or touching anybody's face, head etc, you are asking for trouble.

    Do you think Crouchy was reacting to an appropriate/inappropriate (delete as you wish) about his wife <yikes>
     
    #4
  5. StokieSmit

    StokieSmit Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    434
    Likes Received:
    10
    Not what I'd call a gouge either, but he should know better...
     
    #5
  6. Pottermouth 328

    Pottermouth 328 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,938
    Likes Received:
    65
    Couch puts his hand with fingers open onto his face... looks obvious enough. Seem's the player's reaction was late though and if that had been Rugby the guy would be in agony. It didn't seem too bad. But, rasie hands into face means trouble for Crouch IMO. Silly boy and no doubt the F.A. will ban him.
     
    #6
  7. peadar1987

    peadar1987 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    627
    Likes Received:
    4
    Silly boy, but at least it means someone a bit more in form will be starting the next few games. He should definitely be banned for it.
     
    #7
  8. I can throw the ball further than Delap

    Joined:
    May 30, 2011
    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    2
    Not a chance, we need a target man, so kenwynes back in <yikes>
     
    #8
  9. sgtpotterslonelyheartsclubband

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,888
    Likes Received:
    5
    Crouchy's got away with it. Lucky boy!!
     
    #9
  10. I can throw the ball further than Delap

    Joined:
    May 30, 2011
    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    2
    Yeah very lucky, should never of done it. Even if olsson deserved it
     
    #10

  11. Pottermouth 328

    Pottermouth 328 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,938
    Likes Received:
    65
    Sgt
    Any source where that came from ? Not seen where it say's anything.
     
    #11
  12. potterpalm

    potterpalm Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    453
    Likes Received:
    1
    Crouch is quite clearly fitting in well LOLOLOL
     
    #12
  13. StokieSmit

    StokieSmit Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    434
    Likes Received:
    10
  14. Pottermouth 328

    Pottermouth 328 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,938
    Likes Received:
    65
    Smit
    Cheers for posting that matie <ok>
     
    #14

Share This Page