Unfortunately for us, this argument will be ended when all the top teams come in for Sessegnon, whilst not giving a second glance to HBA.
This is a load of karp tash his shooting may be better but you say his chance creating and passing is better? Yesterday Sess played the defence splitting pass for larsson to run through for the McClean chance, then on another occasion beats merieles and then Ashley cole for pace and strength and puts it on a plate for Gardner who misses, man city game shrugs of Zabeleta plays a defence splitting pass to send Bendtner away who misses, he then sets up Ji need I go on, he creates everything for us the difference is we can't finish what he creates this is why you say he has no end product. atm for me Sess is way above HBA for now even if you can't accept this.
If HBA was that good he would be starting every week instead of being a sub. He scored a wonder goal against a 2nd rate defense, that does not make him a great player. I have not seen him enough to comment if he is better than Sess or not but that's mainly because he hardly plays.
Im sorry to burst your bubble..but bent affa.... flatters to decieve.....the old saying that cream rises to the top i believe is relevent here ..........if affa was that good he would be playing at the top level(and staying there)not playing for a lower ranked club like newcastle or sunderland .....it is the same for sess..yes they are both fine players but sorry to use the x factor but there is something about both players that is lacking....having watched sess for a season i am aware of his shortcummings(has not got a strong shot) and since pardy does not play him all the time there must be something about affa that is lacking...it apears that affa is a super sub.....not a 90 minute player .....and as for skill between sess ana affa.having watched both they are slightly different in their approach to beating a player..i have watched footy for a long time and affa does stuff that i have seen done before but some of the stuff that sess does i have not seen before and doubt many could copy..i think it is because hes built like a weeble....... but some of his shortcomings i think mon will work on and sadly he will be off but safc will be £££££££ in...any way time will tell.....but it is difficult to compare quality between players...you look at how far up the ladder they climb ...so they both have far to go!
And Sess is clearly better looking and intelligent. please log in to view this image please log in to view this image Cue some head scratching and splinters.
What difference does it make. Both good players. I'll go on what I've seen and on sess, his end product looks weak, Ben arfa needs to work on his pass selection and know when to lay his pass off. Bottom line, Ben arfa is playing in a team 12 points clear of the team sess is playing in. Any individual is only as good as the team around him.
SO Alfalfa being a substitute in a lucky team, makes him better than a first team player from a team having to work for their wins.
Both on a similar level skill wise and outfield play, but Ben Arfa nicks it for his end product. Sess couldn't seem to score in a brothel, Ben Arfa has a proven eye for goal. and did none of the sunderland ones here see Ben Arfas defence splitting pass to put Best 1 on 1 which he couldn't convert. Both can play at that game
If Sessegnon ever score's a goal like Hatem's v Blackburn come back and argue about it. Ben Arfa on form is one of the best players in the league, Sessegnon is not.
I don't really see how the newcastle lads can come on here caliming sess' end product is poor having clearly not seen very much of him at all. He has come on leaps and bounds under MON. And for the record, stats in England: ------------------Apps----Goals----Assists Sess---------------37---------7-----------9 HBA---------------18---------3-----------2 Doesn't really scream to me that HBA is the far superior player, as alot of the mags on here seem to be suggesting?
