http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/16550777.stm In light of the Blackpool fixture been moved for the TV cameras, I came across this article with Arsene Wenger been critical of the influence TV cameras have over the game. Arsenal boss Arsene Wenger has claimed football has "sold its soul" to television companies. He accepted the importance of the money TV rights brought, but said Premier League bosses must intervene to ensure fixture scheduling was fair to clubs. The Frenchman said: "The Premier League has to make sure that there is a bit more fairness in the schedules." All five of Arsenal's games during January have been moved for the television cameras. "I don't believe the Premier League has played, in the last month or the last year, a very fair role in the distribution of the fixtures," Wenger said. However, he believes the sport's governing body must do more to limit the influence television companies have. "We have sold our soul and we do not control our fixtures any more," said Wenger. That last line sums it up really. TV companies can change fixtures at the drop of a hat, bringing inconvenience to fans.
Would the promised land of the Premier League be what it is today without Sky investing so much into it over the years? I see the point how games are constantly moved, with up to 24 of their 38 league games available to be moved by ESPN/Sky. Also earlier in the season, some teams were playing Sunday in the league on Sky, and then on Tuesday in the Carling Cup on Sky, which shouldn't be allowed, even if they field youngsters on the Tuesday for the cup. Manchester United faced this scenario twice and Man City/Liverpool once. How can the Premier League protect them though? They have already capped how many times each team can be shown (4 per rights package, 6 packages total) - what else does he want? A lower cap? Less TV games? Its all good and well being for the traditional Saturday 3pm games, but sometimes theres being selfish and being intelligient, and Wenger is being the former here.
It's a bit of a pain in the arse when a game is moved, but they get moved for things other than TV(like Brighton) and it's hardly the end of the world. In addition, anything that irritates Wenger gets my full support.
....and here's the Guardian's take on it: Arsenal's Arsène Wenger accuses rivals over TV fixture changes Arsène Wenger called for 'more fairness' in the scheduling of games after hearing of the latest changes. Photograph: Stefan Wermuth/Reuters Arsène Wenger has claimed rival clubs exert undue influence on match scheduling as a result of their relationship with television companies and has bemoaned the Premier League's inability to impose better control of the broadcasters' demands over fixture changes. The Arsenal manager, whose team play at Swansea live on Sky on Sunday, believes the onus is on the Premier League to ensure there is "more fairness in the schedules". Wenger had expressed frustration in the run-in last season that Manchester United, the eventual league champions, had played a series of fixtures after his own team, with his outburst on Friday apparently due to ESPN moving the FA Cup fourth-round tie against Aston Villa back 24 hours to Sunday 29 January. That has had a knock-on effect with the subsequent midweek trip to Bolton Wanderers moved back a day to Wednesday 1 February. The current top four will have played the previous night and, by the time they are next involved on the subsequent Saturday afternoon, Arsenal will have played twice with their kick-off against Blackburn Rovers at 1pm. "I believe the Premier League has to make sure there's a bit more fairness in the schedules," said Wenger. "[The fixtures] are sold to television and television is influenced by some clubs to choose the fixtures. And some clubs get advantaged by television, if it's Sky or ESPN, because they have an influence there from the clubs directly. "The Premier League should be very much bigger than they are in front of that. I do not want to go personally on any one club but, if things are repeated, then it's not a coincidence any more. There's a real problem there. The Premier League should master the fixtures. It can't happen every year that some clubs have advantages compared in relation to the fairness of the competition. At the moment, television decides. You cannot have decisive games with one team playing Friday and Tuesday, and another on Sunday and Tuesday. I've been working for 30 years in football, and it is not right. It's not fair." Wenger would not elaborate upon which clubs he considered were exerting influence on the fixture scheduling. Asked whether he had evidence of rivals influencing broadcasters' schedules, Wenger replied: "What do you call proof? I am in sport. If I fight with you in a 100m run and you have to run the semi-final on Sunday morning and run against me on Sunday afternoon and I have a run on Friday morning, I don't need to accuse anyone. I just say: 'Is that fair or not?' It's not. The responsibility of the Premier League is to make sure that Premier League fixtures are better distributed than they are. "If the Premier League doesn't decide, it is the television that decides. That means that television can influence and the Premier League has nothing to say. That's what, basically, I think is not right. Because if, tomorrow, you buy a club and your best friend is the owner of Sky TV you don't think you will tell him, 'Look, you put us on Friday night. That's not fair'? Or, 'You put us on Sunday night, that's not fair'. We have sold our soul and we do not control our games, our fixtures, any more." The Premier League, which uses an independent organisation to determine fixtures, says scheduling is determined not just by the demands of broadcasters but also by the requirements of police, other safety organisations and local transport networks, and that no favouritism is granted to any club. Indeed the clubs sign off on the proposed schedules. Sky and ESPN declined to comment. http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/jan/13/arsenal-arsene-wenger-tv-fixture-changes
