The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Thursday 18th June)

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

ellandback

Well-Known Member
Forum Moderator
Mar 30, 2011
63,382
35,094
113
Southampton
You must log in or register to see images


Good Morning. It's Thursday 18th June, and here are the latest headlines from Elland Road

Legal action could net Leeds tens of Millions

Leeds United's legal assault on Leicester City could see them awarded tens of millions in compensation, potentially dwarfing the £40 million Burnley secured from Everton in their own Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR) case. The Whites are seeking to hold the Foxes accountable for their financial misconduct, with the club's legal team constructing an compelling case on two fundamental fronts.

The first element of Leeds' argument centres on the 2022-23 Premier League campaign, where both clubs suffered relegation. Leeds contend that had Leicester been punished in real-time for their financial breaches, the resulting points deduction would have fundamentally altered the final league standings, potentially preserving Leeds top-flight status. This argument hinges on the premise that Leicester's unlawful advantage during that campaign directly impacted the competitive integrity of the division.

The second, and perhaps watertight, prong of Leeds' argument is equally compelling. During the subsequent 2023-24 Championship season, had Leicester City been removed from the equation, Leeds would have secured automatic promotion. The club's lawyers will argue that failing to achieve promotion at the first attempt severely decimated the club's resources, creating a cascading financial crisis that continues to reverberate today.

Following relegation, forced sales and loans of key players crippled Leeds United's financial standing. The club may never have been compelled to part with talents including Crysencio Summerville, Rodrigo, Robin Koch, Tyler Adams, Marc Roca, Luis Sinisterra, Rasmus Kristensen, or Diego Llorente. You may feel this is far fetched, but had Messes Harrison, Wober and Aaronson not left Leeds on loan, their careers may have taken different paths. While some supporters will have been relieved to see the back of some of these players, you can't argue that Leeds' negotiation powers were severely diminished by their desperate circumstances.

Football finance expert Kieran Maguire has quantified the brutal cost of Premier League relegation at approximately £100 million, while the subsequent season, where Leeds narrowly missed out on an immediate return via the play-offs, proved equally ruinous. With Leicester having already received a six-point deduction for their 2023-24 Championship spending offences, Leeds possess compelling evidence that they competed against an unlawfully funded rival, directly undermining their promotion aspirations.

You must log in or register to see images


Leicester City fans rubbish suggestions of legal action

Leicester City have adopted a firm stance of non‑engagement following the article in The Times regarding potentially getting sued by Leeds Utd for gaining an unfair sporting advantage which had a detrimental effect on the Whites. A club spokesperson told the BBC and The Athletic that “the club has no comment at this time” and declined to elaborate on the potential litigation.
Meanwhile, Leicester fans have brushed aside the lawsuit as mathematically unsound. They point out that the Foxes finished seven points ahead of Leeds in the 2023‑24 table (97 points versus 90 points) and argue that even if Leicester’s eventual six‑point deduction had been applied instantly, the club would still have retained a one‑point advantage.

Many have also voiced criticism of Leeds’ American ownership group, 49ers Enterprises, accusing the club of a “litigation‑first” culture, and suggesting that the legal move is more about deflecting from their own managerial decisions than seeking genuine recompense. However, Leeds will argue that Leicester’s financial breaches, which contributed to both teams relegation in 2022–23 and to Leicester's promotion in 2023–24, caused significant financial detriment to the Whites, that warrants compensation.

You must log in or register to see images
 
You must log in or register to see images


Good Morning. It's Thursday 18th June, and here are the latest headlines from Elland Road

Legal action could net Leeds tens of Millions

Leeds United's legal assault on Leicester City could see them awarded tens of millions in compensation, potentially dwarfing the £40 million Burnley secured from Everton in their own Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR) case. The Whites are seeking to hold the Foxes accountable for their financial misconduct, with the club's legal team constructing an compelling case on two fundamental fronts.

The first element of Leeds' argument centres on the 2022-23 Premier League campaign, where both clubs suffered relegation. Leeds contend that had Leicester been punished in real-time for their financial breaches, the resulting points deduction would have fundamentally altered the final league standings, potentially preserving Leeds top-flight status. This argument hinges on the premise that Leicester's unlawful advantage during that campaign directly impacted the competitive integrity of the division.

The second, and perhaps watertight, prong of Leeds' argument is equally compelling. During the subsequent 2023-24 Championship season, had Leicester City been removed from the equation, Leeds would have secured automatic promotion. The club's lawyers will argue that failing to achieve promotion at the first attempt severely decimated the club's resources, creating a cascading financial crisis that continues to reverberate today.

Following relegation, forced sales and loans of key players crippled Leeds United's financial standing. The club may never have been compelled to part with talents including Crysencio Summerville, Rodrigo, Robin Koch, Tyler Adams, Marc Roca, Luis Sinisterra, Rasmus Kristensen, or Diego Llorente. You may feel this is far fetched, but had Messes Harrison, Wober and Aaronson not left Leeds on loan, their careers may have taken different paths. While some supporters will have been relieved to see the back of some of these players, you can't argue that Leeds' negotiation powers were severely diminished by their desperate circumstances.

Football finance expert Kieran Maguire has quantified the brutal cost of Premier League relegation at approximately £100 million, while the subsequent season, where Leeds narrowly missed out on an immediate return via the play-offs, proved equally ruinous. With Leicester having already received a six-point deduction for their 2023-24 Championship spending offences, Leeds possess compelling evidence that they competed against an unlawfully funded rival, directly undermining their promotion aspirations.

You must log in or register to see images


Leicester City fans rubbish suggestions of legal action

Leicester City have adopted a firm stance of non‑engagement following the article in The Times regarding potentially getting sued by Leeds Utd for gaining an unfair sporting advantage which had a detrimental effect on the Whites. A club spokesperson told the BBC and The Athletic that “the club has no comment at this time” and declined to elaborate on the potential litigation.
Meanwhile, Leicester fans have brushed aside the lawsuit as mathematically unsound. They point out that the Foxes finished seven points ahead of Leeds in the 2023‑24 table (97 points versus 90 points) and argue that even if Leicester’s eventual six‑point deduction had been applied instantly, the club would still have retained a one‑point advantage.

Many have also voiced criticism of Leeds’ American ownership group, 49ers Enterprises, accusing the club of a “litigation‑first” culture, and suggesting that the legal move is more about deflecting from their own managerial decisions than seeking genuine recompense. However, Leeds will argue that Leicester’s financial breaches, which contributed to both teams relegation in 2022–23 and to Leicester's promotion in 2023–24, caused significant financial detriment to the Whites, that warrants compensation.

You must log in or register to see images
Good ol' Gary could lend them a few quid <whistle> ...
You must log in or register to see images
 
Have Leicester the resources to pay 100m in compensation. Ive no idea but very much doubt it. Unusual though that were on the attacking side of the battle, were usually in defence mode
 
Have Leicester the resources to pay 100m in compensation. Ive no idea but very much doubt it. Unusual though that were on the attacking side of the battle, were usually in defence mode
I very much doubt they’ve got a pot to piss in, on the football side of the business. However I don’t think that we should be shy of pursuing it, if the club (and its advisors) think there’s a winnable case. I mean we’re Leeds - what could possibly go wrong.
 
I very much doubt they’ve got a pot to piss in, on the football side of the business. However I don’t think that we should be shy of pursuing it, if the club (and its advisors) think there’s a winnable case. I mean we’re Leeds - what could possibly go wrong.
Right youve had your say, no need for you to pollute this thread any longer :emoticon-0102-bigsm
 
I very much doubt they’ve got a pot to piss in, on the football side of the business. However I don’t think that we should be shy of pursuing it, if the club (and its advisors) think there’s a winnable case. I mean we’re Leeds - what could possibly go wrong.
Millions in legal fees and nothing in return......... Again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eireleeds1