Match Day Thread FIFA 2026 World Cup Finals

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Scotland are through with three points surely? Deflected goal, poor quality on show by the looks of the “highlights” but it still counts.
Good luck to them

Won me a bit of money also with them scoring and there being under 2 goals <cheers>
 
Haiti were unlucky. They were the better team for much of the game, and it wouldn't surprise me if they took a point off Brazil or Morocco. Still, I'd rather play badly and win than play well and lose. 3 points will only be enough to qualify if we only lose our two remaining games by one goal.
 
As promised, I'll donate £100 to charity after Scotland beat Haiti.

I've decided to donate to Scotland's Charity Air Ambulance.
Nice one, Ponders. Against Morocco we'll probably play a lone striker, which means Dykes favourite to start, so another charity could benefit from the generosity of Not606 Charlton fans.
Ok so here’s my one - If Scotland win any game in the World Cup and Dykes scores in any I will donate £100 to charity
 
Last edited:
Scotland are through with three points surely? Deflected goal, poor quality on show by the looks of the “highlights” but it still counts.
Good luck to them

Won me a bit of money also with them scoring and there being under 2 goals <cheers>
The jocks goal difference could end up being -4 or -5 so that could work against them.

It's always good to bash the bookie :emoticon-0137-clapp
 
Scotland are through with three points surely? Deflected goal, poor quality on show by the looks of the “highlights” but it still counts.
Good luck to them

Won me a bit of money also with them scoring and there being under 2 goals <cheers>
The jocks goal difference could end up being -4 or -5 so that could work against them.

It's always good to bash the bookie :emoticon-0137-clapp
Bash the Bishop surely?
More enjoyable the bookie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwoWrights
Justice that the frogs got their goal.

The VAR decision to not award them a penalty was ridiculous. The referee had a look as well.
 
Justice that the frogs got their goal.

The VAR decision to not award them a penalty was ridiculous. The referee had a look as well.

VAR as inconsistent as ever. I would argue it is applied with less consistency than we see in old-fashioned unassisted refereeing.
And of course at huge extra cost.
Old fashioned refereeing only costs the wages of the officials.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElfsborgAddick
I’m back in the country and finally able to watch the games live.
Good to see the directors have retained the age old tradition of showing sorts in the crowd. France are my current favourites
 
Also, does Wayne Rooney come with subtitles?
I hope Farage is watching - this is why we need foreigners in our country. The frogs along side him are more coherent
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwoWrights
VAR as inconsistent as ever. I would argue it is applied with less consistency than we see in old-fashioned unassisted refereeing.
And of course at huge extra cost.
Old fashioned refereeing only costs the wages of the officials.
It has always left more questions than answers.

Without VAR decisions even themselves out.

BTW, the drinks break for the Norway game they are blaring out 'Living on a Prayer', ffs, a circus.