Why not? How much did we pay for Joseph?no way we get 2.5 for Burstow IMO.
Why not? How much did we pay for Joseph?no way we get 2.5 for Burstow IMO.
Did he? He said he wants two big names/quality players and then a lot of potentially good, which feels a lot like what Sunderland did.He kind of distanced us from the Sunderland model. He said they spent a lot (which I'm not disputing) implying we wouldn't spend nearly as much, which probably means adjusting expectations. I slightly worry that this is how you do a Burnley.
its def a reality check in that, we dont have close to the budget of sunderlandFor balance, he did also say he thinks we'll sign 1-2 players who are of the level that we'll seriously miss when they're injured (maybe a weird way of putting it when I write it out but it sounded better when he said it). But he did talk a lot about going down and coming back up again and having a bigger budget the second time around, and about players coming into improve and make money in the long term, rather than getting the best players for now.
even burnley spent 100m last summerI think it’s all smoke and mirrors, he’s still gonna drop 100m and it’s still gonna be mental.
Serj said he wants 12-15 so that'll be about rightAnyone following Acun's Q&A's in previous years should probably know by now that 6-8 realistically means 10-12.
And 10-12, probably means 14-16.
I thought it interesting that he thought the incessant injuries weren't just a coincidence.For balance, he did also say he thinks we'll sign 1-2 players who are of the level that we'll seriously miss when they're injured (maybe a weird way of putting it when I write it out but it sounded better when he said it). But he did talk a lot about going down and coming back up again and having a bigger budget the second time around, and about players coming into improve and make money in the long term, rather than getting the best players for now.
It doesn't matter how much an owner is worth and hasn't mattered for some time.its def a reality check in that, we dont have close to the budget of sunderland
their owner is literally a billionaire, plus they sold jobe bellingham for like £30m that same summer
It doesn't matter how much an owner is worth and hasn't mattered for some time.
How is that relevant to our transfer budget for this season which was the discussion and comparison to Sunderland? In fact owner wealth is even less relevant from less season as clubs can only spend a percentage of their income. Sponsorship is far more relevantso how is the clubs academy and training ground plans going to be funded?
Im a bit behind on this thread but if money for Akintola would be enough that can't be much different to the extra money from the playoffsFrom the sound of it I don't think it's a large amount at all. Reading between the lines I think it was hinted at in January that getting a move for Akintola would've kept us compliant then. I doubt it'll mean making a major sale that we don't want to make.
I listened to Q&A and my feelings is that the main concept is investment in young and talented players while selling some players before July. This is a business oriented model to make money but not the best model to stay in Premiership.
I have a feeling Acun is betting on his coach to create another miracle, and its not a big deal if it doesn't happen.
A lot of top Prem clubs have new coaches and might have turbulent season and lose some points, ans its perfect year for Hull to do everything to stay up.
In other words I believe it will be way harder to stay in Premiership in 2-3 years if Hull goes down and up again, than right now.
The pl is objectively the weakest it's been in a while with the amount of managerial turnover amongst the top clubs. Probably the most disruption since Leicester won the league.Every year whatever division we’re in is the weakest it’s been for years and next year will be much stronger and tougher.
i thought training ground etc wasnt counted in incomeHow is that relevant to our transfer budget for this season which was the discussion and comparison to Sunderland? In fact owner wealth is even less relevant from less season as clubs can only spend a percentage of their income. Sponsorship is far more relevant
Bellingham certainly helped them, but we're not going to spend wildly less than them. Might have to settle for not qualifying for Europe.i thought training ground etc wasnt counted in income
but to add to sunderland
they got almost £40m from selling watson and bellingham last summer, how much can we get from outgoings?