Match Day Thread Play Off Final. Hull City v Boro

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

City win?

  • City

  • Smoggies

Results are only viewable after voting.
Ullofaman said:
Another AI take:
It is a complete operational and philosophical nightmare for the EFL and the Independent Disciplinary Commission because **every single choice available directly undermines the validity of the competition.**
The situation is a classic Mexican standoff of sports law, where every party has a loaded argument ready to fire:
### 1. The Middlesbrough Legal Threat (Delaying the Final)
Middlesbrough’s stance is clear: they have already labeled expulsion as the "only appropriate response." If the commission leaves Southampton in the final on Tuesday, May 19, Boro have every grounds to appeal the decision or seek a High Court injunction to halt the Wembley match.
* **The Nightmare:** An injunction would postpone the final at the absolute eleventh hour. It would leave the EFL facing astronomical compensation claims from broadcasters, Wembley Stadium, and thousands of fans—some of whom have traveled from as far as Australia and Peru—who would be left holding useless train and plane tickets.
### 2. The Hull City Trap (The Default Demand)
If the EFL tries to split the difference—forcing Southampton to play but saddling them with a heavy penalty clause or a massive points deduction for next season—they walk straight into a trap set by Hull City. Hull can quite rightly argue: *"Why should we risk our entire multi-million-pound future playing against a team that has already been legally deemed untrustworthy/cheating in this very tournament?"*
* **The Nightmare:** Hull could play the final "under protest" or refuse to take the pitch, demanding a default promotion. If they play and lose to a penalized Southampton, Hull’s legal team will tie the Premier League and the EFL in knots all summer, arguing that a compromised team took their top-flight spot.
### 3. The "Ghost Promotion" Paradox (Loss of Integrity)
If Southampton plays under a future points penalty and wins promotion, the Premier League inherits a radioactive product. A team starting the 2026–27 Premier League season on -12 points because of an EFL cheating scandal destroys the integrity of the top flight before a ball is even kicked. It punishes the Premier League for an EFL failure.
### The EFL's Self-Inflicted Wound
Making matters worse, Middlesbrough's statement highlighted a catastrophic administrative error: **the EFL apparently failed to properly publish the specific guidelines and tariffs for a "spying" breach beforehand.**
Because the EFL didn't have a clear, pre-written "Spygate = Expulsion" rule in the handbook, any radical punishment the commission hands down right now will look like they are making up the law on the fly. Southampton’s lawyers would dismantle that on appeal in minutes.
### The Bottom Line
The Commission is trapped in a room with no good exits:
* If they **expel** Southampton, they face a structural collapse of the playoffs, a logistical war, and a furious Hull City fan base left in limbo.
* If they **fine/penalize** Southampton, they admit the competition was corrupted but let it proceed anyway, completely destroying the concept of sporting integrity.
It is a disaster of epic proportions. The EFL is essentially praying for a miracle on Tuesday, but no matter what the commission recommends, the 2026 Championship Playoff Final will go down in history as the most legally compromised match English football has ever seen.
Click to expand...

I thought the thing was between the EFL & Southampton .

Boro have no right of appeal against whatever penalty the Panel hand out .

Of course they can take Southampton to court , but that’s down to Boro .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stockholm Tiger and Gone For A Walk
I really don't think it'd be a good look for City to press a legal claim if we aren't given a walk over. Its not really anything that's affected us so far?

Would feel a little like opportunism and I know I don't have millions riding on it, but we'd not really deserve it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarbyDays
Drew said:
I really don't think it'd be a good look for City to press a legal claim if we aren't given a walk over. Its not really anything that's affected us so far?

Would feel a little like opportunism and I know I don't have millions riding on it, but we'd not really deserve it.
Click to expand...
Bollocks…our opponents broke the laws of the game, they systematically cheated. Kick the ****s out & pass us the 200 mill bag of cash
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim the Tiger, gtigerbackin hull, BlackAndAmberGambler and 14 others
Decided on tiger travel in the end. The uncertainty tipped the balance because normally I’d be up for finding a decent hotel bargain to the west and train/tube in to London, but the usual hotel bargains were non-refundable. TT is virtually door to door and at least I can try to snooze on the way back if it’s rearranged to a mid week evening match. Provided no idiots decide to wait an hour for a MaccyDs at a service station on the return.

The last time I got TT it was a bone shaker with very hard seats and I had a numb arse by the time we got to Sheffield. Hoping for something more comfortable this time!
 
  • Like
Reactions: nbetiger
TigerMarv said:
Cheers ive decided to drive. The upside is less time travelling and cant be drinking so dont have to pay stupid London prices for beer.
Just booked some parking on someones drive in Stanmore and will tube the last bit
Click to expand...
I've done the same but I'm only driving from Leicester. Valencia Road Stanmore looks nice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerMarv
Number 1 Jasper said:
If we get kicked out ( Probable but not definite) you going straight up is honestly my preferred option .
Click to expand...
I’m still struggling to square the circle between the legal aspects, the massive investment of the EFL, face saving etc.

I don’t think it’s necessarily the fairest outcome, but my best guess is that we’ll be playing you as planned next Saturday in front of a more or less sold out Wembley and a worldwide TV audience.

If we win we go up and everyone at the EFL breathes a sigh of relief. If we lose you get kicked out, only two teams go up and West Ham or whoever get a reprieve.

But what happens in the next couple of days to make the game still happen without it being an absolute farce is a different question.
 
The mood of Southampton fans on their board has changed significantly after another sports lawyer -- who had argued On Talksport that expulsion seemed excessive -- has subtly changed his position based on his interpretation of the Swindon 2026 EFL Trophy case. After reconsidering that, he says Southampton fans need to be worried (see my next post nicked from the Boro board for his argument in detail). [As an aside, it's always been my own (tigermaul not the lawyer's!) view from the start they will at least get kicked out of the playoffs. But I think they will probably be hit by a triple whammy. Expulsion from playoffs, significant fine, and either significant points deduction for next season or the most draconian, relegation to League One. That would leave the wriggle room for an appeal whereby if they accepted the play off expulsion, the other parts might get reduced.]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: GLP, Gone For A Walk, dennisboothstash and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back