The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Thursday 26th March)

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

ellandback

Well-Known Member
Forum Moderator
Mar 30, 2011
63,357
34,995
113
Southampton
You must log in or register to see images


Good Morning. It's Thursday 26th March, and here are the latest headlines from Elland Road

Beren Cross identifies reason for Leeds goal drought

Beren Cross, the Leeds Utd correspondent for The New York Times has been looking into the numbers to see why goals have dried up for West Yorkshire's finest. Farke's me have failed to score in four consecutive Premier League games. They have one open-play goal in six league matches, and that was gifted to them by a Chelsea mix-up at Stamford Bridge.

The reality is a bit of a double-edged sword. While Leeds have managed back-to-back clean sheets and conceded only three goals in their last five games, that newfound defensive solidity seems to be coming at a heavy cost to their attacking spark. For a team that usually averages a healthy 1.19 goals per 90, failing to score in four straight Premier League games is a massive red flag.

The stats reveal a pretty clear "why" behind the drought: Leeds are simply making life too hard for themselves. In their last six matches, they’ve underperformed their expected goals (npxG) by nearly four, managing just two goals when the data suggests they should have had six. A big part of the problem is shot selection; the team has moved from taking shots at a dangerous 13.3 yards to firing from a much less effective average of 18.4 yards out.

Up until matchday 25, Leeds outperformed their xG, but the shift since has been noticeable. The Whites may be enjoying more shots on target recently, but to beat a top flight keeper from distance is going to take something special.

You must log in or register to see images


Harry Wilson remains top Leeds target this summer

It’s a massive night for the "Welsh Whites" as Ethan Ampadu, Joe Rodon, Karl Darlow, and Dan James gear up for one of the biggest fixtures in recent memory. Wales’ clash against Bosnia and Herzegovina in Cardiff. it’s a high-stakes games with big reward, with the winners facing a final showdown against either Italy or Northern Ireland for a place in this summer's World Cup.

However, the Leeds connection in the Dragons' camp could be set to expand from a quartet to a quintet if Daniel Farke gets his wish this summer. The Leeds gaffer has long been an admirer of Fulham’s Harry Wilson, a player whose tactical DNA seems almost tailor-made for Farke’s system. A move for Wilson this summer makes perfect sense for the Whites, provided they maintain their top-flight status.

Farke is specifically hunting for a versatile and creative forward who can drift inside to occupy the half-spaces, a role Wilson has mastered at Craven Cottage. With his contract negotiations at Fulham reportedly exhausted and his current deal weeks away from expiring, the possibility of landing a player of his calibre on a free transfer is a mouth-watering prospect for the Elland Road hierarchy.

The "sensational" form Wilson has displayed this season, boasting 17 goal involvements, explains why Leeds were so desperate to sign him last summer. However, the path to signing him is far from a clear run. Is the lure of playing alongside your International teammates each week higher than joining a club with European aspirations? Both Everton and Aston Villa have also been strongly linked with the 29yo, making a move to Elland Road perhaps a little less likely, but certainly not impossible.

You must log in or register to see images
 
Morning all

I don't see where Wilson fits into this team assuming we stay up and then assuming we stay up I would expect Farke to be replaced.

He has a year left on his contract and we know their are constant rumours of the 49ers looking for an upgrade so I would question anyone linked at the moment.

Finally, what are we actually paying our recruitment team for, if Wilson really is still our main target, then that's pretty poor
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makemstine Roger
Morning

I thought James Trafford was our top target for this summer. BTW Villa wants Wilson so I expect him to go there
Correct. The big European teams will get first dibs at new signings, then Sunderland, then us. Well be left with scouting out gems again that nobody else was chasing. Still if we get three or four of the calibre of Stach we should be ok in next seasons relegation battle again
 
Morning all

I don't see where Wilson fits into this team assuming we stay up and then assuming we stay up I would expect Farke to be replaced.

He has a year left on his contract and we know their are constant rumours of the 49ers looking for an upgrade so I would question anyone linked at the moment.

Finally, what are we actually paying our recruitment team for, if Wilson really is still our main target, then that's pretty poor
If Farke goes, does that mean doc will be back to say I told you so
 
Correct. The big European teams will get first dibs at new signings, then Sunderland, then us. Well be left with scouting out gems again that nobody else was chasing. Still if we get three or four of the calibre of Stach we should be ok in next seasons relegation battle again
Players went to Sunderland over us because the offers were what the asking club wanted. We seemed to be chasing the same players due to wanting improvements in the same positions, that should all change next season and I can't see Sunderland having the same funds available. I wouldn't say any player would choose us over Sunderland or them over us, it will be a fairly level playing field I'm sure
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brizzlewhite
If Farke goes, does that mean doc will be back to say I told you so
I can't remember if Doc said we would not get promoted under him or we would go straight back down, hopefully both or either statement will prove wrong, shame he doesn't post here any longer. I've not seen Shaks post much either, a few regulars have stopped, Whitejock another, I hope it is just by choice and not illness

Hope you and your family are coping with the pressures of life away from football too mate
 
Players went to Sunderland over us because the offers were what the asking club wanted. We seemed to be chasing the same players due to wanting improvements in the same positions, that should all change next season and I can't see Sunderland having the same funds available. I wouldn't say any player would choose us over Sunderland or them over us, it will be a fairly level playing field I'm sure
Our PSR headroom is still very good for next season.
 
We've previously complained about the team trying to walk the ball in a la old style Arsenal.
I think the issue is that we're now too slow on the transition and hence the opposition have time to get bodies back, pushing the shooting range out. We got around that for a while with pin point crosses into DCL, but that has stopped working.
 
I can't remember if Doc said we would not get promoted under him or we would go straight back down, hopefully both or either statement will prove wrong, shame he doesn't post here any longer. I've not seen Shaks post much either, a few regulars have stopped, Whitejock another, I hope it is just by choice and not illness

Hope you and your family are coping with the pressures of life away from football too mate
Coping but that's the operative word thanks Ristac. Getting back to as many as the old normal habits as possible without mrs Eire
 
Doc has had a strange couple of seasons. Doesn't seem happy with Farke in charge even when he succeeds. A strange take to have really. He should be enjoying the ride.

I think i tipped him over the edge in January when I said we couldn't afford Connor Gallaghers wages so couldn't possibly be in for him. He's been in a sulk since.
 
It’s official. Gudmondson should not have got a second yellow. Doesn’t help us of course.

But next year it would be reviewable. Woohoo.

More strangely the same panel didn’t think Brennan Johnson’s was a yellow, which I thought was pretty clear cut… Cynical foul stopping a break.