Good Morning. It's Thursday 4th December, and here are the latest headlines from Elland Road Leeds deliver statement win over Chelsea Elland Road roared back to life on a memorable night for Leeds United as Daniel Farke’s team earned a resounding 3-1 victory over Chelsea in the Premier League. The atmosphere was electric, with supporters witnessing a performance steeped in discipline, grit, and opportunistic attacking play. In his post-match interview with BBC’s Match of the Day, Farke expressed the significance of the occasion: “For nights like this, we were so desperate to bring the club back to the top level. Elland Road was back to its best.” From the outset, Leeds executed their game plan with precision. Chelsea dominated possession, as expected, but Leeds were unyielding in defence, allowing virtually no clear-cut chances in the first half. This defensive organisation, Farke emphasised, was the cornerstone of the win: “The key today was to return to our best behaviours in terms of defending… reduce Chelsea to little, they didn’t have one proper chance in the first half.” When Chelsea pulled a goal back in the second half, Leeds maintained composure and resisted any momentum shift. Farke’s strategy centred on pragmatic adaptability, acknowledging that as a newly promoted side, Leeds must sometimes prioritise disrupting the opponent’s strengths over imposing their own style. “I’m not married to a formation,” he explained, “but married to principles… it’s important to be unpredictable and adapt to different scenarios.” The tactical discipline paid off. Despite having just 28.6% possession, their lowest share in a league win since beating Reading in 2016 with 23.2%, Leeds created enough quality chances to secure the victory. Their set-piece threat, direct transitional play, and strong pressing in key moments proved decisive. Dominic Calvert-Lewin, speaking to Sky Sports after the match, highlighted the attacking intent and connection with the fans: “Today it all came together, more forward, dynamic, and on the front foot… my job is scoring goals, so that’s the best way I can repay them.” His goal was a testament to Leeds’ commitment to exploiting Chelsea’s defensive vulnerabilities when opportunities arose. This result sends a clear message; Leeds can match up against the division’s elite through tactical organisation, disciplined defending, and ruthless efficiency in attack. For Farke, it’s proof that principles matter more than possession, and that flexibility is the hallmark of survival and ambition in England’s top tier. FARKE "To win the game in this manner, deserved by chances, expected goals, goals, shots on target, set pieces. Of course they had more possession, I would have liked to have controlled the game a bit more, but overall a well deserved win, complements to the lads. "The key today was to return to our best behaviours in terms of defending, in our last games we didn't give much away. For us it was crucial to reduce Chelsea to little, they didn't have one proper chance in the first half. "After they scored it was important not to allow any more chances. The key was to be rock solid at the back. As a side that dominated and won the title [last season] I would rather stick to a base formation and give a bit more consistency and safety in the processes, but it's fair to say we are not the side with the highest quality in this league, we have to accept this. "As a promoted side you have to concentrate to take the strength of the opponent away, mirror the opponent, play more pragmatic. I want to play more direct like we used to, but if you are promoted you have to be flexible and adapt to the opponent. I'm not married to a formation, but married to principles. I want to see the same principles on the pitch. It's important for the future for us to be unpredictable and adapt to different scenarios." CALVERT-LEWIN: "You look at the performances we've put in over the course of the season, sometimes we've deserved more. Today it all came together, more forward, dynamic and on the front foot. Knowing we were at home we knew we had to start the game like that. It's always good when a plan comes together. "I realised straight away the passion of the fans and what it [playing Chelsea] means to them. You feel that straight away. My job is soring goal so that's the best way I can repay them and for the support they've give me since joining the football club." please log in to view this image Had Farke done enough to save his job The question of Daniel Farke’s future at Leeds United has loomed large in recent weeks, with the German manager enduring a torrid run of six defeats in seven games. Yet, throughout this slump, Leeds’ players never stopped running for their under-fire boss. The commitment was there; what was missing was a system capable of unlocking their potential. That breakthrough appeared to arrive — almost by accident — at Manchester City’s Etihad Stadium. Trailing 2-0 at half-time, Farke switched to a 5-3-2 formation, partly forced by injuries and circumstance. While Leeds eventually lost 3-2, the performance stripped away the fog of the previous two months, offering a glimpse of a more resilient and balanced side. When Chelsea arrived at Elland Road, the question was whether Farke would stick or twist. He resisted the temptation to revert to his preferred 4-3-3 and instead doubled down on the 5-3-2 setup. The decision proved pivotal. Against the Club World Cup champions, unbeaten in 12 matches, Leeds looked organised, combative, and tactically disciplined. Chelsea dominated possession, as expected, but their cutting edge was blunted. For all the visitors’ ball retention, clear chances were in short supply, and the atmosphere around the ground shifted from anxious to quietly confident that Leeds could weather the storm. There is however frustration among sections of the Elland Road faithful that it took an enforced tactical change for Farke to find a formula that works. This wasn’t an innovation born of deep tactical epiphany; it was a solution stumbled upon during the half time break at the Etihad. Leeds were 2-0 down, and Dan James was unable to continue. The only (sensible) option was to bring DCL into the equation, and switch to 3/5/2. We all recognise the hallmarks of a newly promoted top flight outfit: a physically imposing, hard-running side making full use of its athleticism and aerial presence, compensating for a relative lack of technical flair; its not rocket science!!! Whether this is a turning point for Farke or merely a temporary reprieve remains to be seen. The Premier League is unforgiving, and tactical solutions that work once can quickly be countered. Still, what matters most is that Farke has found a setup that plays to the strengths of his squad and re-energised his players, the fanbase and his bosses in Santa Clara, California. please log in to view this image
Morning all Farke has probably saved his immediate future with the last two performances and given the 49ers a major headache. For the record, I don't think we can attract better and I think we should keep him for now. Expressing my concerns for debate and trying not to be accused of being a Farke hater. So many fans were calling for 5-3-2 earlier in the season, why has it taken Farke until now to try it out. We spent money on Okafor, we wanted the Fulham left winger on the final day, we already had James, Gnonto and Harrison, we are light with wing backs, I'm sure the 5-3-2 wasn't in Farkes mind at the beginning of the season. A couple of seasons ago he took too long in realising Rutter and Piroes best position, last season he could have cost us taking too long to drop Meslier, it felt like the 5-3-2 switch was the last roll of the dice rather than tactical genius. Credit due though, he has had us performing well for half of the City game and yesterday. Liverpool will know we are going to turn out 5-3-2 against them, it will be interesting to see if they have an answer for that
What an absolute buzz. Woke up this morning with the goals running through my head. Have to say Bijol's goal was absolutely immense, the way he launched himself at the ball and got so much power and direction behind the header that nobody would have stopped that one. Tanaka....another cracker of a goal having had a practise shot earlier that dribbled wide. Nmechia's offside goal was so well taken and he almost volleyed another in. Now I'm not one to get carried away, there is so much to be done but they have proved they can do it.....oh **** it....can't resist.... https://www.google.com/search?gs_ss...ate=ive&vld=cid:4b0d0e6a,vid:ZEWkZb11pss,st:0
IM not getting carried away. but, we have chomped on the bit. can see a togetherness in the team and a bit confidence back. People say its a bad time to play the scousers a wounded animal. I think its the perfect time If we can beat Chelsea we can beat them. What a buzz it would to have back to back wins against two champions.league regulars.
[QUOTE="Normanbitmyleg70, post: 18816785, member: 1013271"https://www.google.com/search?gs_ssp=eJzj4tVP1zc0TEmrNDArM8kxYPQST8zMK1HIy1coLskvKMjMS1coLQZyywH9kA1J&q=aint no stopping us now&oq=aint no stopping us&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqBwgBEC4YgAQyCggAEAAY4wIYgAQyBwgBEC4YgAQyBggCEEUYOTIJCAMQLhgKGIAEMgcIBBAAGIAEMgkIBRAAGAoYgAQyCQgGEAAYChiABDIJCAcQABgKGIAEMgkICBAAGAoYgAQyBwgJEAAYgATSAQg4NjM1ajBqN6gCALACAA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:4b0d0e6a,vid:ZEWkZb11pss,st:0[/QUOTE] That is so gash.............but I like it.
Agree it wasn't on his mind, we'd have tried it pre season. We'd also need more target men for subs/injuries if we played two up top. There's a lot of talk about changing the system earlier. Clearly if you look at the last game and a half you can see why people think it should have been done earlier. I accept the above as legitimate comment and i accept the point about being slow to change... keepers etc. My counter would be, we were competitive in almost every game... 433 had us deserving of probably 5-6 more points. Whether that's eye test, expected points, chances created, touches in the opposition box etc. You can argue whose fault it is that we didn't get them is, but the system was making us competitive. In the cirumstances I could see why he felt we were really close to being a midtable side. He was the 4th out of 5 managers we had who played Meslier for too long. He openly said he didn't think you should change keepers unless you really had to, and its clear he feels the same about his footballing philosophy. Strong willed and believes in his way of playing... or a stubborn fool. Fine line sometimes. His post match interview made it clear he'd rather be playing possession football BUT, he did recognise that we needed to stay in games and were leaking too many goals down our left - that's why he changed. Turns out that these fancy dan high pressing glamour boys don't like it up em. Whether it works against Everton or Brentford is another matter. Whether we'd have more points playing 3 at the back all season is again open to debate. What matters is it worked last night and let's hope he gets the right set up for the right opposition going forward.
Another point that doesn't get much of a mention is the quality of Stachs corners. His delivery is lethal and we now look capable of scoring every time we win a corner
