I know of loads of Twitter grifters making money off making things up for simple Hamas fans if you’re interested.
Foster is one of those people who spouts bullshit all day long and gets taken seriously because he himself happens to be Jewish. The gullible west trip over themselves to hear his "expert opinion".
I know the full story behind this now, reverse search is handy for stuff like this. It was a survey that was done, and I can't see Paletinians mentioned anywhere, but I can see an article, but I can't read it entirely because it's subscription, see below the reverse search I carried out... First I went and found his account and this specific article, which wasn't time stamped nor in it's full context on here of what it was replying to... Heres the comment in it's entirety and it's replies... https://x.com/_ZachFoster/status/1993061957134582066 Within that I found this among it's replies... https://x.com/Xnerdz/status/1993102676952039858/photo/1 I checked the article was genuine here the timeline for it is January 18, 2011 it's subscription... https://www.haaretz.com/2011-01-18/...-as-rape/0000017f-df30-db22-a17f-ffb162e20000 Here's a Guardian article posted 3 days later after the above article from 14 years ago Fri 21 Jan 2011 08.30 GMT ... https://www.theguardian.com/world/v...od/2011/jan/21/israel-palestinian-territories
Well played. So basically this cretin has dredged up a survey done 14 years ago, pretended the question asked in the survey was a totally different question, and then regurgitated his lies on Twatter for the likes of my Rt. Hon. fellow Spurs fan to post over here? You've summarised western "journalism" in a nutshell. What interests me is that 30% of East Jerusalem Arabs would prefer to become Israeli. I wonder how much higher that percentage is 14 years later.
Cheers. I never trust anything that is just a lazy screen dump. No date, no time, obvious context is missing. It really didn't take me that long to reverse search all that stuff either, google more or less gives you the results straight away, the only real research I did was looking for the original article this nonsense was pulled from, one of the replies gave me that, so it was just about pulling out the evidence of it, rather than taking someones say so on Twitter that the article exists.
I've seen the video to this one via Reuters, I will not post it up it has an 18+ tag. I went looking at it because I remember a few of the surrender rules from the Ukraine / Russia conflict, and where these incidents have happened in that war and how easy it is to get yourself shot within the rules of engagement if just one person of a group fails to follow the instructions given. The two guys game out of the building, hands up and also pulled their shirts up, I assume all on request because the video had no sound as the commentator wouldn't shut up talking. They then appeared to get directed to go back into the building and as they did so, they were shot - I don't know why. My personal opinion of what I saw was it appeared like an execution, to make it look as though they were trying to run/crawl back inside. I'm open minded so happy to listen to other interpretations of what happened.
It’s two men being executed at home while surrendering War crime isn’t it? Imagine the stuff that happens that isn’t recorded.
I wouldn't have thought that building was their home was it? - Looked a bit war battered, more of an industrial unit. Everyone is commiting war crimes, the sad face of humanity. At least once we die we don't have to tolerate ourselves anymore as a species, my way of embracing for the inevitable in life, at peace with oneself. Once we dispel our shells, our suffering concludes like a breeze of wind - being alive is just the educational part, just make sure your homework is done, otherwise you get sent back again, next time maybe as an Israeli.
