1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

The new PSR

Discussion in 'Newcastle United' started by Darren Peacock’s Ponytail, Nov 21, 2025 at 4:32 PM.

  1. Darren Peacock’s Ponytail

    Darren Peacock’s Ponytail Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    35,819
    Likes Received:
    24,821
    Clubs have voted 12-7 in favour of the new PSR.
    I'm feeling ill so can anyone summarise the pros and cons for Newcastle?
     
    #1
  2. No27

    No27 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2024
    Messages:
    12,051
    Likes Received:
    8,178
    It's the same **** redressed... Percentage based so nothing will change it's still anti competitive... Clubs can spend more than others.

    It allows the PL to instantly sanction clubs, so clubs can't front load money and try and tidy it up over 3 years.
     
    #2
  3. Rum & Black for 2

    Rum & Black for 2 Champion’s League Prediction League Champion
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 1, 2011
    Messages:
    31,270
    Likes Received:
    26,728
    Initially, more interested in which Clubs voted which way. That would potentially be a starting point as to which Clubs are likely to benefit and which are not.
     
    #3
  4. Roland Deschain

    Roland Deschain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    15,540
    Likes Received:
    13,064
    The likes of Brighton, Brentford, Leeds, voted no.
     
    #4
    Rum & Black for 2 likes this.
  5. No27

    No27 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2024
    Messages:
    12,051
    Likes Received:
    8,178
    Ultimately if it's percentage based in relation to revenue its the same thing at it's core.
     
    #5
    magpie290761 likes this.
  6. Darren Peacock’s Ponytail

    Darren Peacock’s Ponytail Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    35,819
    Likes Received:
    24,821
    So the American owned clubs voted for?
     
    #6
  7. No27

    No27 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2024
    Messages:
    12,051
    Likes Received:
    8,178
    Here we go

    images (4).jpeg
     
    #7
    G4rdToonArmy likes this.
  8. Roland Deschain

    Roland Deschain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    15,540
    Likes Received:
    13,064
    Those with major or US backing said yes.
     
    #8
  9. Obi Wan

    Obi Wan keeper of the peace
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    43,079
    Likes Received:
    30,009
    So clubs can no longer sell assets like hotels and women's teams to assocuated parties for the purpose of recording revenue. So just let Chelski do it and then bolt the door behind them. Cool.
     
    #9
  10. Obi Wan

    Obi Wan keeper of the peace
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    43,079
    Likes Received:
    30,009
    BBC:
    "Squad Cost Ratio (SCR) got 14 votes in favour and six against, which is the minimum number that is required to exact a rule change...

    But linking the wage bill to income is not attractive to clubs with less financial resources. That is why Bournemouth, Brentford, Brighton, Crystal Palace, Fulham and Leeds voted against."


    That's the 6 clubs who voted against it, so we must have been in favour.
     
    #10

  11. Obi Wan

    Obi Wan keeper of the peace
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    43,079
    Likes Received:
    30,009
    But anchoring to the value of the lowest club's revenue was voted against (7 votes for vs 12 against and 1 club abstained).
     
    #11
  12. Roland Deschain

    Roland Deschain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    15,540
    Likes Received:
    13,064
    They still haven’t ratified that deal so there’s going to be huge huge pressure on the PL to hit Chelsea somehow.
     
    #12
    Obi Wan likes this.
  13. No27

    No27 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2024
    Messages:
    12,051
    Likes Received:
    8,178
    It's how football is decided... Off the pitch and Newcastle are just part of the same ****... 7th highest revenue so quite happy with the rules, which allowed them to look after their own advantages. This is why Newcastle don't fight against it, because it protects them.

    Everything that happens on the pitch is a charade. What we take in is a manufactured competition, a fake sporting contest.

    Football is decided by financial rules off the pitch and no matter how they redress it, that's what it's about.
     
    #13
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2025 at 5:04 AM
  14. Obi Wan

    Obi Wan keeper of the peace
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    43,079
    Likes Received:
    30,009
    We wouldn't have wanted the anchoring rule, so that was a win.
     
    #14
  15. No27

    No27 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2024
    Messages:
    12,051
    Likes Received:
    8,178
    I'm not so much focussed on Newcastle, but the sport in general is horseshit being spooned out to us all.
     
    #15
    Obi Wan likes this.
  16. Obi Wan

    Obi Wan keeper of the peace
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    43,079
    Likes Received:
    30,009
    Yeah, that's fair enough mate. :emoticon-0148-yes:
     
    #16
    No27 likes this.
  17. No27

    No27 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2024
    Messages:
    12,051
    Likes Received:
    8,178
    They'll rinse this until eventually everyone is bored of it and then they'll come out saying football is sick so we need a super league.

    How about they just go back to football the way it was before they made it sick with their rules.
     
    #17

Share This Page