he says he really doesnt want to re-open the debate, yet he makes a 455 word post saying just how correct he was more than once
Seems to be plenty missing the point, it wasn't what Acun said but what a number of posters interpreted it all to mean and then posted all the doom and gloom most of which has turned out to be incorrect. See GFAW earlier post for examples.
Where was the fraud allegation? He obviously had liquidity issues as he's alluded to himself but I don't recall there being an allegation of fraud,
What turned out to be incorrect? Are you now saying he wasn't struggling to provide liquidity? If he wasn't then why where the changes he alluded to necessary?