1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Match Day Thread Fat Frank v Javi / Cov v Wat 25th October

Discussion in 'Watford' started by Mexican Hornet, Oct 23, 2025 at 9:16 PM.

  1. Markthehorn

    Markthehorn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2011
    Messages:
    21,049
    Likes Received:
    7,653
    Lost a game mainly down to our own errors and lack of ruthlessness

    Very frustrating.
     
    #41
    Hornet-Fez and andytoprankin like this.
  2. andytoprankin

    andytoprankin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    8,645
    Likes Received:
    4,065
    Definitely was strange. I thought he was strong last time out, as per usual, he's very strong, I'm at a total loss to understand that. But Javi knows best. <ok>
     
    #42
    Markthehorn likes this.
  3. Hornet-Fez

    Hornet-Fez Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    9,902
    Likes Received:
    5,333
    CCFC were clinical up front, Watford weren't. Then ill disciplined at the back.
    Much improved despite the scoreline.
     
    #43
    Markthehorn likes this.
  4. J T Bodbo

    J T Bodbo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2012
    Messages:
    1,947
    Likes Received:
    1,256
    This will seem weird, but I think we have great promise , great spirit, and need only small changes to be in top 6 - as long as we can keep going. Coventry scored 2 scruffy goals, one quite decent one and play with a lot of freedom - good for them. But, on another day we'd have won that 5-3 and would not have a player sent off. (Abankwah does have that rush of blood streak in him.)
    However, I think we'll be upper mid table by mid season, and will have ( for a change) a really good 2nd half. Big squad, better cohesion , lot of powerful and quick attackers. Gracia has even got Ince to be effective , which is quite an achievement. One of our 3 CF's needs to be clinical enough to be undroppable ( which one ?) and we have Georgi, Dwomoh and Maamma to come.
    And the other bonus is that a 3-1 loss to the top of the table is not surprisinng, and it's only 3 points. I thiunk we've done the diviison a favour - Coventryare getatable !
     
    #44
  5. andytoprankin

    andytoprankin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    8,645
    Likes Received:
    4,065
    Utterly agree, JTB. <ok>
     
    #45
    Hornet-Fez and Markthehorn like this.
  6. Luther

    Luther Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2020
    Messages:
    541
    Likes Received:
    807
    That was a strange game. Watford dominated possession until Abankwah was sent off and then Coventry had the greater possession. Coventry were clinical and scored from their only 3 shots on target. Watford had 8 shots on target, but their finishing (especially Vata) was poor and Rushworh (a goalkeeper on loan from Brighton) made some great saves. Watford had more touches in the opposition's penalty area than Coventry and their XG was also much higher.

    Some people have pointed out that Sissoko and Kayembe were not at fault with the goals, but too often they were bypassed in midfield (which lacked mobility) and it was Sissoko's backheader which set up Coventry's third goal. Watford appeared more solid defensively after these two players had been substituted, although there may have been other reasons. Perhaps Coventry just eased off when they had a three goal lead.
     
    #46

Share This Page