It's ultimate selfishness ... once caught they should have compulsory deductions from their wages or benefits to pay for the damage ... however long it takes ...
Yup, seriously mate as I've said many times on here, get the detention centres built and make the families pay for their upkeep within them centres. Those that can't pay for their upkeep, make them toil for it. We need to start getting tough on this ****. If you don't deal with it, it just morphs into bigger social problems. These people lack discipline so time to start dishing some out, Chinese style. We've become way to soft and people are taking the piss.
I have mentioned before on here but the crime description "anti social behaviour" really pisses me of. Smashing windows and kicking peoples fences in is "criminal damage" that costs people money therefore should be charged as such.
Take a life deliberately, should mean he’s never released. Preferably a public hanging to send a message out.
As much I'd like to see them pay for it, the trouble is that a lot of folk on benefits would just be plunged into even more poverty and it would probably turn them to even more crime. I think people should be given sentences where they are made to work to pay off the equivalent damage. So if you smash up a pub and cause 20k worth of damage, then you're on a work programme for a year. There's plenty of jobs that need doing in this country. If you don't turn up, then stop their benefits completely. If you already work, then absolutely deduct the cost from their wages, even if it's £50 per week for the next however many years it takes to pay it off.
It's those middle aged white men In suits running round the country sexually abusing people on buses innit. Gnev was right they Must be stopped
I'm not sure how this would work. I think some women prefer the protection of men being around, rather than isolating them in a carriage, which would raise several problems - one being how would you stop a man from entering a female only carriage, thus if it's late night, woman isolated on her own, in a carriage by herself....pissed man gets onboard, all the men that would protect her are segregated in other carriages with their female partners. Will they employ male guards, then the male guard attacks her. Carriages these days are not like the past, today they are all walkthrough (although not sure about the tube carriages), so how would you prevent a man from walking through that carriage, if you have an enclosed carriage, you've just upped the risk as per my earlier comments.
Actually thinking about it, wasn't that the reason we did away with enclosed carriages to reduce the personal security risk.
