British Politics spam thread

I love London, that's why I live here.

 

Would you like some to wash down that large lump of hypocrisy?

 

Shut the **** up about the EUROPEAN UNION then , London isn't a member & you decided to stay

 

I'll do my bit.

It was guys like me who didn't comply to covid tyranny that meant that we aren't still living under medical totalitarianism.

My next test is to not sign up to the govt ID system that all company directors will need to sign up to in order to 'comply' with the law - I wont comply.

The Fabians have taken over, the AI surveillance will give them complete control over nearly every aspect of your life via Digital ID and CBDC.

You will own nothing and be happy - or else!

 

Where's the hypocrisy, Doid?

My potential desire to leave Blighty has nothing to do with the blacks and everything to do with the society being foisted upon us by the State.

 

When I retire, I might see if I can spend half the year in France.

 

You own loads and are ****ing miserable

 

Killer blow, not sure he's coming back from that

 

I'm not miserable at all - I could be given 6 weeks to live and I'll still be content in myself, thats just how I roll.

Thank's for giving consideration to my mental state though, at least you care (Joby doesnt)

 

You believe its reasonable for you to flee your country but put far stricter criteria on those coming here.

They're going to tax me

 

Oooh ... me too ...

 

When the whole country looks as dog **** as Leicester then I'll be off.

Not even Gary refugees welcome Lineker could bare staying because it's full of smelly Pakis & Africans

 

That's called a holiday you dolt , you had the option to move to France permanently but declined.

 

Smiley overload Doid.

Enjoy your early morning sesh with Aldo

 

Free movement advocates trying to pour scorn on people thinking of moving is quality.

The ones liable to move to the States, by definition would be people capable of providing for themselves. Those people are currently a net gain to the UK. They are liable to be replaced by people that are a net loss which means others would have to provide even more.

It's a doom loop.

 

The loss to the UK economy looks more than manageable ... but don't forget to write...

 

Like 6th form students the Starmer government & their lemming cult followers believe that taxing **** out of the bourgeoisie will make things more equal.

**** the farmers & landlords the government should seize the means of production.

They don't realise that sucking the blood of the productive whilst importing millions of non productive 3rd World Labour voters will force business owners out of the country & the burden will be put on the working classes .

Multimillionaire socialists at the head of the Labour Party burning your money

 

The system they're pushing punishes high achievers. There are something like twice as many people on £99k as there are on £101k, as people avoid that demarcation as it brings in a lot of other expenses that would make a pay rise, a loss in available income.

It means that the ones daft enough to go for those sort of salaries are unlikely to be the best.

As has been said many times, the Laffer curve and 6th form economics are not likely to help fill the government pockets.

If electronic surveillance and ID for open information is so good, let's see it applied to all political processes and spending first so we can see it in action. Under current proposals, MP's would be exempt from electronic ID.

 

But they want to know everything about you.

There's something insidious about this new social media scandal... What you may know...

Starmer's govt is spending thousands on social media influencers but not disclosing which ones are they paying. So he's using our cash to push his propaganda with the influencers likely not disclosing they're government-backed.

What you may not know... Labour have also refused to disclose details of their social media spy unit over at the Dept for Science and Tech.
They said releasing basic info on staff numbers, flagged post claims, etc. would somehow hinder their ability to "monitor and address" online activity.

So they won't disclose which influencers they're paying while also blocking info on their secret spying operation, which is likely liaising with police if they find "speech offences".

In February 2020, Starmer took to X declaring: "We need a transparency revolution. There should be no power without accountability, and true accountability requires transparency."

Some revolution that turned out to be.

https://x.com/StarkNakedBrief/status/1978719052701864446