It seems to me you are hanging on news or pieces of irrelevant information to make something out of nothing. Like I said it's not difficult to understand for the reason I gave, which was he'd only been in office for 11 days. But rather than conceding to facts, you proceed to engage in your petty little games, much like how I notice you keep calling people childish little names recently if they dare challenge your opinion on anything.
Sure mate - he never said he 'deserved the Nobel Peace Prize' ... he is the epitome of humility and self-awareness ... and calling names ffs! ... Desperate Dan?
I never said he didn't ever say that, the quote you have given. I said he couldn't win it because he'd only been in office for 11 days. Since then you've been scurrying around the internet for anything that any world reporter asks. As for name calling, it's not just in arguments, you are doing it to anyone who dare challenges anything you say. You've done to Gessa, Duggie all most recent ones. No wonder politics is so devisive when people hang on these tabloids every word and have the incapacity of actually thinking for themselves.
I think the terms are 72 hours for Hamas to release the hostages, after the start of the ceasefire which was supposed to happen immediately after the Knesset had agreed the peace plan. Let's be real here. That ceasefire needs to start now. If it doesn't then no hostages are getting released and the whole thing risks falling at the first hurdle.
Edit : Israel now saying the ceasefire is in effect UN ready to deliver aid as soon as Israel open the border. 1300 UN trucks waiting at the border ready to deliver aid. Thank Allah they've got rid of that murderous GHF outfit.
Well I proved above that he could have won it ... last sentence in article - but you'd rather pass over that because you ain't too happy when your 'conclusions' prove to be incorrect ... Tabloids? OK ... so where did you get your information from? ... the Oval Office? If you haven't yet gleaned that I rather like to be 'challenged' on the forum, then you really don't get me at all - which is fair enough ... ... and I like to think that Duggie and Gessa are two of my finest 'adversaries' on here when it comes down to 'bantz' ... and if they didn't insult me from time to time I'd feel rather 'unloved' ... the names I apply are meant to be funny ... if you want to identify someone that gets really bitter and personal mind...
You never proved anything, you just went scurrying for **** from the media. My stance was clear, he couldn't win it because he'd only been in office for 11 days, that does not make it virtually impossible, but commonsense would prevail and say it was very unlikely. As the article clearly stated that you are now holding onto, the period being judged would have been 2024 not 2025. So Trump not only was in office for only 11 days, the period being judged was 2024. But rather than you accept what I said, because it challenged your pettiness, we go down the usual road of how you are the victim.
I never claim to be a victim - I have never put anyone on ignore - asked for bans - nor misused my moderator powers. My stance is clear too - he couldn't win it, more down to him being a self-serving, egotistical twat than a man of real ethics and a true seeker of world peace... irrespective of time in office. I'll leave it there... Happy Friday mate...
You do claim to be the victim, only the other day I supposedly had an agenda against you. I challenged you with fact against a BBC link, you didn't like that I dared to do that, because your hatred of Trump was more important to you and that's fine, but I don't think I deserved to be dismissed on the basis of hatred and your egolistical stance.
Unless they are based on details provided by the Hamas Ministry for <Insert Name Here>, in which case they are to be taken as fact by all of humanity.
