The toothpaste will never go back in the tube now these people know they can ponce around every weekend doing what they want.
Israel has approved the first phase of a Gaza deal which will lead to a ceasefire and the release of hostages, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office says A ceasefire was due to come into effect once the Israeli cabinet had given its approval - but eyewitnesses tell the BBC there were air strikes in Khan Younis overnight First part, great second part, ****ing sort it out.
It's typically unrealistic of Hamas apologists to think every individual in Gaza is going to suddenly allow it to be San Francisco 1967. It'll take a long time if it ever happens and there'll be deadly hiccups along the way, retaliation, crying about Israel daring to retaliate i.e. the usual cycle. It's great news it seems short term peace is nearly here but it's naive to think this is genuinely over. It'll out-live us all.
It’s unrealistic to think there’s going to be a long lasting peace overnight. But the terms of that ceasefire are that Israel stops the minute their cabinet agreed the peace plan and they’ve already broken the terms sort it out.
The terms are/were they have 24 hours to withdraw which is happening as we speak. Hamas could always release the hostages a few days early to demonstrate their good faith.
San Francisco in 67 had it’s share of drug casualties, Hells Angeis, and of course Charlie Manson. And nearly 60 years later, an era of enduring peace and love is as elusive as ever, especially in California. On the other hand, Jefferson Airplane and The Grateful Dead still sound brilliant today, and those hippies did arguably hasten the end of the Vietnam War.
Donny is not going to be a happy carrot bunny... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c1l80g1qe4gt Guess there's a price to pay for shooting up Venezuelan boats?
Eh? What's that got to do with Trump, it was a reporter asking the question - I heard the questions being asked, Trump wasn't even present. Like I said he had only been in office for 11 days, so to reach the cut off date nominations would have had to of been in by less than 11 days of office. If this was a year from now I'd say fair enough, so he goes again in one year, surely that's not difficult to understand.
No worries... the BBC aren't really being critical ... this now... https://time.com/7324832/trump-loses-nobel-peace-prize-maria-corina-machado/
Trump didn't ask anything. A reporter did using his name, as anyone could use his name if they want to make a story, maybe the reporter don't know the rules of when nominations have to be in by and the relevance of that to Trump's term in office was at the time.
It's what the media do to sell news. I stand by what I said, he couldn't win because he had only been in office for 11 days (20th Jan 2025), nominations had to be in by 31st Jan 2025. He was never likely to get nominated in such a brief period of time, this isn't difficult for even you to work out surely.