But you’re talking one view from that fixture where nobody said “sack him” but instead (rightly imo) criticised what are similar failings we seem to see with a bit of regularity.. There has been countless amounts of praise where it’s been due so really we have to consider the balance of all things. It’s not all rosy right now, but it’s ok to say that Howe has also given us the best memories for 30 years and the only trophy in 70, incredible feats but not then beyond any criticism when sat in 15th and below an abysmal Man U.
Not specifically 'sack him' but GG has been quoted 3 times as saying something tantamount to that. Think its on the game thread but can't be bothered to look again. That, for me, is an unacceptable stance.
Those views weren’t just from one game. People also infer that he has to go but that’s ok as long as the actual words sack him aren’t said?