So just seeking some clarification on all this, but that means the manager gets the credit for wins or good results and the manager should therefor be open to criticism for defeats?
SB never impacted upon any single game. He had no plan A let alone a plan B. He was fortunate for ASM playing well for 5 minutes here and there. When ASM was **** we as a team tended to be ****. Not going to respond any more as you clearly understand but you're just being antagonistic because you're bored.
How's that? He picked the sides and tactics? I'm just pointing out that I'm not going to take any lessons from people that couldn't credit previous managers after wins... I'm fair mate.. I'm not a hater. Not being antagonistic I'm just annoying you, because you know I credit when due and vice versa.
Last Champions League campaign Howe was lambasted for the injuries become he just stuck with his favourites and didn’t rotate
We've discussed SB a million times but you keep saying you give him credit but no credit is due. Yes he picked teams but please tell me apart from pass it to ASM and pray what were these tactics? How come our players were so unfair they were blowing out their arse after 20 minutes. You know all this hence the antagonism
Is someone saying he shouldn't be rotating? He definitely should, but it has to work. He will be fully aware he's judged on results. Question changes etc should be perfectly acceptable... Hating on him is another level.. I don't do that.. I didn't even with Bruce.. I didn't like all that.. It was nasty stuff imo.
“Time to realise that Howe isn’t the man” “Time to give Eddie the credit he deserves which is total failure “ Not saying he should be sacked?
