Who's saying that? It's still far too early for that, but his in game management is poor mate I think that's why people are saying... Been saying it years tbf
Did I mention I thought the ref was ****e ??? all game Arsenal were throwing the arses into our players because they couldn't out jump us then as soon a Botman does it, it's a foul
It was Pope conceding possession in the end that cost us. He saved the day early on, but as the game progressed we needed to keep the ball
Not his fault Tino literally got injured two minutes later. You even says at the time it was positive and it was.
The only time I can remember them working was an accident. We were losing to west ham and his initial changes were injured so he had to bring Hall and Barnes on and we won 4-3.
We should have had a penalty. They should have been down to ten men. But yeah..... EH. So this is the third season in a row that he's ****......
Bringing fwds on is seen as positive defenders negative but that's all hocus pocus.. Subs should be made tactically and one here or there in most cases... It's whether they work.
It does. Subs should impact the game and how they're foreseen is irrelevant.. It's only a positive change if it improves the situation.
Eddie Howe seems to make subs which significantly kills us. Most good managers make positive subs. But our lad always seems to **** things up.
You're right on this GG...if you search howes in game management it's clear its not reactionary based on today.
Before the bedwetters brigade come out and slam us. We have won one game against wolves. And we were **** there aswell.