I think the Tories were right to ask for a Parliamentary investigation, I'm certain Labour would do the same if roles were reversed. I'm not saying Rayner has done anything wrong, I don't know enough about the relevant tax regulations to make that judgement. It looks odd though, so let's have someone independent get to the bottom of it.
I don’t think there is anything to get to the bottom of, it’s legal so there is nothing anyone can do about it, it just lets you know she’s a hypocritical tart when she’s demanding everyone else pays their fare share.
What baffles me is if she’s took her name off, someone else’s name will have had to go on, so why do they not get charged the £30,000 she didn’t have to pay. I’m sure they can’t just acquire a free house and pay nothing.
Yes, but a Parliamentary investigation looks at ethics not criminality. If she is being shifty (but legal) in her financial affairs they would report that.
https://blogs.oxford.anglican.org/a...C3aWd3mhxwDSRnUIPf_aem_P0JJrCTfY0ReoRpRDwoflw An open letter to Farage from the Anglican Church
