Thank you, nearer 40%. And you have no evidence of any further abuse to bulk out this figure. You imagine what many of us may be aware of? I am sorry that is not really accurate auditable data is it? And Bristol? Where does that figure come from?
If only taking the moral high ground and choosing selective data were a proven formula for winning an argument eh?
motorway roadworks that close the motorway - say follow diversion and then the diversion signs stop in the middle of nowhere
An example of selectiveness? Let’s use your second statement then. Why aren’t the same elderly trying to stop other genocides that are happening on an equal or larger scale? 150,000 deaths in Sudan, 10 million plus displaced as a selective example. Anyone seen a Sudan flag waver recently?
It's not, I agree, but do you disagree with the premise? It is still 4 in every 10. The Bristol data is in the same article.
I deleted that because I knew it would provide an in for you to change the topic. Can you please tell me what is selective about it, you said I was 'taking the moral high ground' and being 'selective'? Please back up your claim or rescind it.
Are you going to rescind calling me an extremist? You don't know me, or my views yet you come to a snap judgement because of one post which happened to disagree with something you had posted.
I will. If you can DM me any evidence of those media establishments trying to paint people who identify as CR, as being FR. @tigerrev
You made a sweeping generalization about what you believe to be the RW media. I merely replied with a similar generalization about the LW branches of the media
Ha! When people suggest that 'big things are coming', it's only right to call it out for what it is. Edit - Sorry, 'big trouble, on its way'.
I'm to the left of Starmer, but anyone that thinks big trouble isn't on the way is blind and deaf. That is all.
