Arsenal -5 Chelsea -9 LIverpool -1 Man City -3 Man Utd -10 Newcastle -7 Villa -3 Palace -4 Spurs -6 Fulham -1 Everton -3 Brighton -4 Forest -8 West Ham -5 Wolves -5 Bournemouth 0 ( you predicted they would finish 16th and they are 16th in the current table) Sunderland -15 Brentford -1 Leeds -12 Burnley -2 Total -104
Obviously it's only the final table against the original predictions that really count ... but monthly 'progess' could be fun ...
... and yet you're in it and continuing to comment ... albeit with no real originality - including your selections ... There's always going out to work instead
That was the intention tbh ... but having set up the spreadsheet, it calculates all the 'scores' when I copy and paste the latest PL table in ... only did the latest 'result' for some bantz ... obviously failed
I didn't mind what he was doing, but everyone else did which is fair enough. I can see everyones point now it's been highlighted. I think if he wanted to do what he's doing, he should have made it a weekly competition, with x amount of changes per week permitted, and the lowest score at the end of the season wins. Trouble is with that, do we get enough variations in the table week on week to make it anything like competitive, I doubt it.
