Which is what the person in the tweet I posted, as well as several others in the chain explains. You can guarantee you'd be arrested if you just walked in to a copper or politicians house in the same circumstances.
It's not. Most Police actually have poor knowledge of the actual law. They get less training than hairdressers. None of which alters the fact that it is patently unacceptable for illegals to be sent the message that they are allowed to just walk in to anyone's home, without any consequences.
The police involved seemed to know the law. Yes, knowing the law is something illegals and legals should be ignorant of. That's a great idea.
The barristers commenting suggest otherwise. Those plod are mindlessly pushing the directive they've been given from above. Yet another contrarian fail. You really are rubbish at this these days. Would you find it acceptable if that had been your granny's house he invaded?
This gammon baby will grow up to vote Reform if police don’t take her into foster care and be brought up responsibly by a couple of married ****s/dykes, one of which will be a *****/abuser. Over to you @Sir Barney Chuckles
So you agree that something should have happened to that illegal trying to enter the blind pensioners house, even if it was only rigorous questioning to find out his intentions. We got there in the end, despite your piss poor contrarianism. BTW, I just double checked, and the law in Scotland is effectively the same as that in England for that situation. If anything, they would have more right to enter your land in Scotland due to the right to roam.
You asked me once about my opinion. I pointed out that it isn't illegal in England so the police couldn't just arrest him for that. You then pretended to already know that How sad You then focus on illegals walking into homes rather than anyone in the country being able to do the same Do you like a bit of trespassing yourself? Are the illegals taking your hobbies?
That's piss poor even by your low standards. Did you see the edit where to add to your other errors, you got the law wrong. You have confirmed that you agree it is wrong for that illegal to get the message his behaviour is acceptable, the rest is just your low level bloviation.
I agree that the women should be able to run without getting harassed, but it does seem to show an interesting sense of priorities and use of resources, not to mention interpretation of laws. A cynic could possibly think it's a way of adjusting the racial profile of crime stats.
