Accidently?? Is that what you told the juvenile court? [/QUOTE] Accident? Not strictly. Anyone who remembers those P2P downloading days knows well, whatever the file was called that you were downloading, isn’t necessarily what you’d get. I know I got a few surprises over the years but that’s the one that sticks in the mind
Such perverse and uncommon terminology to have an entry in every British or North American dictionary. Arse licker: an offensive word for a person who you think is too friendly to somebody in authority and is always ready to do what they want. synonyms: crawler, lackey, sycophant, toady, apple polisher, bootlicker, fawner, groveler, groveller, truckler someone who humbles himself as a sign of respect; who behaves as if he had no self-respect If a few people are calling you that, then perhaps consider how you come across. Hope that helps.
Were all the Carabao Cup games on Sky Sport red button and Now TV bonus streams last season? Anyway, tonight's games is available according to Now TV.
And if you repeatedly post that phrase, then perhaps consider how you come across....clue ...as a juvenile inadequate. How that helps more.
Or just someone who doesn't pigheadedly deny facts they find 'unsettling'. And I think you're confusing me with the others who repeatedly refer to you as an arse licker. I've primarily used sycophant. But we have a few alternative synonyms for you now. We can use them in rotation.
"We"? You mean the diminishingly small handful of you who are looking more ridiculous by the day? Go on then .... what 'facts' have I actually denied? He's selling us? He's lost all interest? He's skint? We're going into administration? We're nailed on for relegation? Those are the sort of comments I've countered time and again. And been proved 100% correct. Seriously, what actual FACTS have I denied? Link? Another clue .... none. Stop making **** up child.
None of the things I've claimed, only that he's spoken to potential buyers but couldn't agree terms, he is struggling to pay the bills and that relegation would have left us at risk of administration -and it would still be difficult financially if we survived. All of those statements have been proven to be substantially true. It was also reasonable to hold the opinion that having transfer restrictions when we had a squad that only survived on goal difference to start with left us at greater risk of relegation. But now we sign a proven striker and midfielder and you try to claim that as proof of it all being made up. Which is absolute and verifiable bollocks.
I haven't claimed anything as "proof" of anything "on the back of us signing a proven striker and midfielder!"! There you go again making **** up!! How about rereading my post and actually answering the question? No? Thought not. Idiot.
So you're NOT arguing that he isn't struggling to finance the club, and that he hasn't spoken to investors about reducing his liability or selling up, and that we weren't going into admin with liabilities we couldn't afford if we had gone down? If you're not arguing any of those things then you're arguing by yourself.
in honour of our opponents today i found this image of gone for a walk and his discovering of everyway he can defend acun please log in to view this image
I saw a few City fans in Bransholme Centre this morning, stocking up on the Ginsters for the trip to North Wales...Safe journey to all those making the trip. That's dedication....Hope you see a good game and a City win.