Transfer Rumours The Great Summer Splurge Transfer Window

If you don't care why are you here.. don't lie biscan

 

You asked if Coutinho went on strike and if Liverpool sold for less than they valued.

Yes he went on strike and yes for less than the value lol.

Even when facts are presented you’re still trying to move the goalposts

 

Because I’m doing nothing for an hour or so before going out so thought would come and have a chat.

 

the point was he was forced out because he wasn't good enough

 

No I aksed a second question 1stbtine around and you side stepped the value.... Then presented some values in Euros that confirmef Liverpool didn't accept a bit for 40 million less than his valuation.

Nowhere near

 

I asked the questions, so I was making the point.

Have nice day

 

Yup. Which is my point. Every club forces players out when not good enough. So can’t expect loyalty from players when they feel they’ve outgrown the club. Most players will look to move to club that can compete and offer more money. Just the way of life. TAA did it to Liverpool, fans were pissed but it happened and move on and look forward to the season instead of dwelling on it.

If Isak had scored 15 goals in 2 seasons instead of 50, club would be looking to sell him as well.

 

and you missed out the point that Isak has improved Newcastle

so why would we want to sell him ???

 

What value? I gave you the link to the article where it said lfc accepted less? What question did I miss?

and I never said they accepted a bid 40m less? I think article said 34m less but tbf no one really knows how much transfers are anyway so impossible to tell

 

Lets simplfy this

Newcastle don't want to sell Isak less than his valuation... Is anything wrong with that? . 40 million lower for further context.

 

Do they or is it just Liverpool?Where have Iask and his agent said "I'm not worth £150m"?

 

and here we go again

another article without substance from the BBC

"BBC Sport has been told by several sources that it is the Sweden striker's ambition to join the Premier League champions before the deadline closes on 1 September."

Name your fecking sources then

 

You don’t? I’m not sure what the arguement is here.

We agree that clubs want to move **** players on and want to keep best players.

Unfortunately you can’t always keep the best players unless you are Madrid and Barcelona as every club is a stepping stone to another.

 

We pick him to play/train (not the first team) whichever it might be and if he doesn’t then fine him 2 weeks wages each time. If the Club do that once a week then he ends up paying the Club £120,000 pw. At least we get some money back.

 

Then pay what he's worth...it's very simple.

 

Way I see it is that if Isak is that desperate to leave he would have handed in a transfer request unless he's a greedy bastard who wants paying off

 

Aye you got short changed there! You couldn't believe your bloody luck!

 

The thing to learn from this is something most people learned many years ago, but these young lads don't care about the fans or how many clubs and fanbases they **** off to reach the top.

It's the way football has been for quite a long time.. Players dream of playing for a select few clubs..... It's a bit like playing a video game where they complete levels... We'd do the same guys.

You'll get some with a degree of loyalty, but even those (Guimereas) just didn't get the offer to complete the game.

 

TC read to the end, TC read to the end, TC read to …..

 

I think this is Liverpools way of trying to get the Andy Carroll money back.