Again, we’ve done this before. Your whataboutery doesn’t change the facts of why they’re proscribed nor stop you and KH being ridiculous middle class apologists for League Two terrorism.
Funny - they're claiming they've never hurt a human being ... must be some misinformation on the interweb...
It’s not that funny and yes, it is. Do you really not remember us having this exact conversation maybe three months ago?
Is that how much the damage cost £7M seriously....they are going down for a long stretch in that case. Got to be 10 years surely?
Yes. That’s not the incident where they hospitalised a copper with a sledgehammer. Please at least remember the last time you googled these things if you’re going to base this nonsense on what you’re googling now.
No idea mate - not sure whether sentences for criminal damage can be linked to monetary value ... or to 'terrorism' for that matter ...
AI Overview Sentencing for damaging property, or criminal damage, varies based on the value of the damage, whether it's aggravated by factors like hate or arson, and if the case is tried in a Magistrates' Court or Crown Court. Maximum sentences range from fines and short prison terms in Magistrates' Court to up to 10 years in Crown Court for basic criminal damage, and potentially life imprisonment for aggravated arson or damage.
Value Exceeding £5,000: If the damage exceeds £5,000, the case can be heard in either Magistrates' Court or Crown Court. If heard in Magistrates' Court, the same penalty as above applies. If heard in Crown Court, the maximum penalty is 10 years' imprisonment.
I do agree that you can’t just go around choosing which laws apply to you. I just think the decision to proscribe Palestine action as a terror group was wrong. It came off the back of them breaking into Brize Norton, which was a massive security failing. That’s the real issue here and they are making an example of them as a result
This is the same as Sucky arguing that burning down a migrant hotel is fine because rape gangs are worse.
Or you arguing that an injured copper is indicative of terrorism... when their mantra is 'non-violent' proest and disruption... ain't many terrorist organisation factions purporting that...
If my mantra was shagging supermodels it wouldn’t mean I was shagging supermodels. If instead of shagging supermodels I was attacking policemen with sledgehammers people could be forgiven for not taking much notice of my mantra. Repeatedly attacking weapons manufacturers and military bases sounds quite terroristy to me.
Sorry mate but breaking In to an army base and causing damage is an act of terrorism in my book. If they care so fuking much about terrorists in palastine to disrupt the city and damage things at army bases **** em they can do the time they get for it. Half the people at these protest deep down hate our way of life and would cut your head off if the the law allowed it. Yknow like sharia law that doesn't exist over here according to you so count yourself lucky this ****s being nipped in the bud cos they will only get braver and more extreme the more they get away with. They should arrest all those top less Muslims in Westminster Bridge beating themselves too. Pure intimidation tactics from the religion of peace again People forget a terrorist attack occurred on that bridge not too long ago.. Tell me that location isn't on purpose and I'll call you a div
41% of rioters arrested last year had a record for domestic abuse or something like that and that was even higher in Northern Ireland. I know facts don’t go down well around these parts women are more likely to be SA by the people protesting outside the hotels than the ones in it.
