They'll do the same with grenfell, and they're still not paying out the post office lot accordingly. And this new islamaphobia rules added to the new online safety act will clamp down on anything the government don't want you talking about such as this grooming thing. One of the grooming victims statements has been censored under the online safety act already for example
What got me with that one as well, was Thatcher manipulated everything to protect her foot soldiers. Even the Leveson report was manipulated so she could implement her own take on things - because she wanted to get at the miners and working classes, so how do you do that, through football, beer and smoking, a lot of what we see today, didn't happen by chance, it's what the wicked witch of the west wanted. She ****ing hated us. It's why I get pissed off with the taxation and banning stuff, Thatcher will be laughing at us in her grave.
and instead with football, we've just replaced it with more corruption and priced a lot of people out of the game...and the latter all part of Thatchers greater plan.
all "closed" environments are prime spots for abuse of all kinds and by the very nature of them the "inhabitants" are often vulnerable . Then you find the people who should be ensuring everything was being done correctly preferred not to look at all as it was so much easier than "causing a stir".
Exactly that, closed environments. I know with Rotherham people might highlight that it's brown people, and that's not me wanting to get at anyone, but more to say it was no different 50 years ago, the same things were still going on in the UK, it's just with todays social media, 24 hour news, so called more awareness, it makes it seem even bigger than anything before, but it's not any bigger, it's the same size problem, but maybe just a different demographic on the front cover. Domestic abuse and child abuse was just as prevalent back then as it is today, actually I'd say it was even worse back then, when they were mainly white British crimes and nowt like today to make people accountable. That's not to lesser todays crimes either, whether it's Greatstone or Rotherham, it's still kids that are the victims of it.
I dont think ****s 50 years ago were specifically targeting vulnerable white children for relgious reasons. Nope I'm not having that.
I didn't mention religion, but as you have; Between 1970 and 2015, the Roman Catholic Church received more than 900 complaints involving over 3,000 instances of child sexual abuse against more than 900 individuals connected to the Church, including priests, monks and volunteers. In the same period, there were 177 prosecutions resulting in 133 convictions. Civil claims against dioceses and religious institutes have resulted in millions of pounds being paid in compensation. https://www.iicsa.org.uk/reports-re.../roman-catholic-church/executive-summary.html
and not just in the UK but worldwide... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sexual_abuse_cases_by_country
and those two above examples are just the Catholic church, it's not counting all the other crimes of the same nature committed by white people outside of religion over the same period. Also remember we didn't have 24 hour news and social media back in the 70's. A lot of cases probably never got found out and perpetrators would have aged and died with never being found out. As was the case with the Romney childrens home, they died before being held to account. Much like the mass abuse by white man Jimmy Saville.
