Well they had 75 million last week.. Surley this questions for the recruitment team though? Maybe they still get one? To answer your second question if they're not 28 and say 23 max you'll either make a profit or get a decent return after 5 years so yeah.
You'd still get a decent return because they'd be young. Values drop, but you don't go from 75 to worthless.. Wilson was 20m at 28 and ended up worthless.
Exavtly, look at Chelsea - commanding increased prices for players who’ve flopped. For all the chaos of Boehly it looks like they were right. Our tippy toeing, pussy footing around to get exactly the right player has been a flaw in leadership for years.
We can't look for profit on every single signing, most yes, but not all, some you need to just sign for the here and now, to try and compete to win things, and just got to take the hit in terms of no resale value.
Newcastle are only going to lose money on Wissa mate.. That's literally a guarantee.. Wilson was just an example. I'm surprised Newcastle are bankrolling this signing.
Obviously, but sometimes you have to sign ready made players, this would be one, as long as most are younguns with resale value, then we can afford to do it.
Tonali and Isak were 23 and ready made ? I'm not saying buy projects. This player is 29 mate.. It's just not good for psr and whether we like it or not that will impact us down the line.
Tonali was being chased down at the traffic lights this morning. I nearly ran one over.. At least this summers signings won't see kids trying to kill themselves for a signature.
