There's a rumour going around that we're trying to sell him to get decent money. But I'd rather keep him. You don't sell one of your best players unless you've already got a replacement.
I like this policy of signing 18-19 year olds. No money spent, but a potential for future profits. Much easier to get behind them than the likes of Harry Redknapp's mercenary ****s.
Kelman has played for US U20s and U18s, but not sure how American he really is. Any luck this will spark a bidding war. If he doesn’t want a contract extension we have to sell him. Not that I’m sure he’s been offered one.
Whilst we have to acknowledge we are a selling club, it does seem the Rangers way to sell exactly the sort of player we have been searching for He could be the missing piece in the goalscoring puzzle that propels us to the promised land, or he could underachieve and leave on a free next year Will probably bang in 30+ in the MLS