I mention a lot of people on here - very few of whom I admire... you mention Sir Keir Starmer a lot - guess that means you admire him... cool.
The evil robot Blair didn’t , can’t see big pansy Starmer doing it . Would need a parliamentary vote???
Don't think i have ever used that name but if i have it was said sarcatically. My detestation of the idiot uaually leaves me useing the last part only as in.... "Sarmer" is a total clown.
There will be no forced conscription , the foreigners will all claim back their dual nationality & most British men would rather go to prison as conscientious objectors . You can't force the Natives to pretend Nationalism is a myth & there's no such thing as an English man then force National service. It's an oxymoron
If he wants to send some military aged men to go fight Russians we have quite a few Afghans & other hotel ****ers that can go . Give them all British citizenship & send them to do the jobs the English won't do
Starmer is trying to groom kids like Corbyn attempted to when he had live bands playing at some of their rallies. If he goes ahead with this then he will have to accept that if kids are old enough to have a say in who runs the country then they are old enough to drink alcohol in pubs and clubs and even smoke if inclined to do so. They could also get married without parental consent. This is why voting age was always known asw the age of cosent.
The SNP did the same to ensure the teens would fall for the fantasy of independence and keep voting them in. Nothing else changed for them, other than SNP Nannying us to death
Epping residents outside the hotel where a "refugee " sexually assaulted 3 local girls is kicking off
Blair's disgrace is a totally different scenario of what is to come. His illegal war was against a foe who he knew the US would beat. What's to come is a whole lot more dangerous. It will be Iraq times 10.
I It's going to be a civil war , burn the migrant hotels then take out Bradford etc. No English are going to fight for someone else's country
The English will do what they're told to do. Just like they've always did. There is only one part of the "British army" who have ever refused to follow orders and that was when the Scottish regiments refused to go to Russia during the the Russian revolution
They shot they're own whenever they sent their troops out of the trenches ffs. There's a bit of a difference between a battalion of soldiers and a whole army.
Aye? Did I not just post about a full Battalion? Is a Battalion more troops than than full Scottish army refusing to go to Russia fight for a Szar?
learn to read mate my post specifically says ww1 if you want to go Napoleonic look at toll puddle marters