The Cricket Thread

Well we have to use 5 bowlers. Wood, Currie, Howell are certs. I'd be reluctant to use Daws TBH.

 

Not with less than 10 overs.

The only rule when bowling less than 10 overs is that no-one can more than two. So we could use just three bowlers if we want.

 

76? That's pathetic.

I was expecting 85 to 90.

 

Ah Ok, that changes things then. Wood 2, Currie 2 and 2 from the others then I would say.

 

Maybe it was good job we didn't retire Albert then!

 

I'm the opposite with Dawson. Depending on the match-up, I'd be open to him bowling an over (or two).

 

As I suspected.

Essex finally perform, and yet the rain prevents a certain four points.

 

I'd probably bowl Wood out in overs 1 and 3.

 

Out-bloody-standing from Wood!

 

A maiden in a 6 over shoot-out!

 

After that I like getting Fuller in now.

 

One more good over should be enough. Because something in the region of 65 to 68 from 4 overs would be very tough.

 

Lucky 4!

 

Poor keeping.

 

Good, Vince is going with Wood again.

 

Yes!

 

This was why I didn't want Dawson bowling.

 

Abysmal fielding.

 

So after all that it's a tie!

 

I mean, may as well have called it off FFS!