most lefty lawyers barristers judges ministers and civil servants are queers, fekking Quintin crisps the lot of em, and the few who aren't their birds are dykes
Stalin 2.0 just cannot stop himself from lying. He even does it during PMQs now. He does not seem to realise that he is the one that is supposed to be answering the questions (which he never does). Asking Kemi Badenoch to apologise for the Liz Truss budget and the £22bn black hole – the one that does not exist – is pathetic and does not answer the question that was asked. She should have told him to resign and call a General Election so that we could get rid of the incompetent technocrat and the backbenches full of loonies that never even had a job before they got elected to represent ‘working people’.
Rachel from Accounts telling more porkies in the Spending Review. Anything that she says that she is spending after 2029 is a lie, so the £39bn for social housing over ten years is actually £3.9bn a year for four years; and she did not say which asylum seekers will be getting that housing. Reeves backpeddling on her previous lies: “there is no guarantee of economic growth”. How many times did she mention more money in the pockets of ‘working people’? We need a definition of working people because it is probably unionised slackers not really working for the State and getting unfunded pay rises with no requirement for extra productivity. Is this not supposed to be the government’s Spending Review? What have Reform got to do with it? The ‘renewal’ that everyone is getting seems to be unemployment up, fewer job vacancies, less tax revenue and more government borrowing to pay National Debt interest. That sounds like the 1970s... Government department budgets are going to rise by 2.3% in real terms. So the Magic Money Tree is in for another pruning. In this “zero-based” Spending Review, now we have to determine whether the ‘zero’ is “chance of delivery”, “intelligence in the Cabinet that approved it”, “chance of the bond market accepting it” or “hope for the future”. 10 year gilt yields were 4.5530% this morning and are only up to 4.5720%; and 3 year gilt yields were 3.8970% and are only up to 3.9195% so not that much more borrowing to pay the interest. Let us not mention the taxpayers’ underwriting the Bank of England as they sell off old QE gilts at a loss.
I know it says in the article that the people of Dover don't want that option, but I'm not sure that is entirely true, they just get fed up with the aggro it brings when the left and the right marchers from out of town, meet up for an annual punch-up. I think the barracks is a good location if done properly and as I said earlier good locations logistically. Although I think one time when one of the barracks was fitted out, they completely trashed it, but I think that was more as protest of the length of time they were being kept there. Then when they experienced the hotel scenario, they wanted to go back to the barracks because it gave them more freedom and without hassle from local people as we saw in the riots. I think if Labour can get the 90 day cycle to work, then it's sort of problem solved, depending how much we can quell the flow. The elephant in the room is the media, because they will put the barracks down everytime, because it's clickbait for it's readers. Yes, there are people that don't want them there but you are always going to get two differing opinions. The hotel and barracks ideas don't affect me either way, I just prefer one over the over from a logistical and cost perspective. You could get little supply shops set up on the barracks as well, to cater for their daily needs, paid for out of any allowance the government give them. That way the money from all of this can be fed back into the system, rather than down the drain in the current system of spaffiing money on hotels.
And stop giving them an allowance. They shouldn't receive a penny. Only an utter imbecile would think giving them taxpayers' dough was a good idea.
See for me this is where it all comes from the planning of the barrack schemes, if you don't want to give them money don't, just set up an on site voucher system that works like money. The idea is to give them purpose in life, still being able to go out and buy your own things, you can do that restrictively with on site stores and vouchers. Where in effect all you are really doing is giving them their daily rations of food and drink, which yes it is free, because it's humanely going to be anyway, you are just making them active in the process, which then aids in preventing boredom. Make the system work so it feels it has a purpose, and then they will feel the same way, thus making tax payers money more cost effective. That's not encouraging them here btw, more in preventing the problems that occur when not managed properly. Also a well functioning process will partially aid in stopping the crossings, because if it has a purposeful cycle they will eventually learn they can't blag the system, coming via this route. I think my overall point is rather than fighting the system, make it work for us.
Just round them all up, put them in a field and bomb the bastards. That will deter others from not staying in "safe" European countries. Poland, Hungary and Denmark excepted.
instead of roaming the streets, they could work to earn their keep. There's enough to be getting on with, especially on council estates. I'd certainly advocate the idea of rewarding hard graft. And it would help to relieve the boredom.
You'll get no argument from me on that, but that's down to us ensuring we are allocating them stuff to do, especially all the young men. It would require resources and money to get that set up, but yeah I'm all for it.
Let me try and add just a small amount of factual reality to this discussion out on the ‘far Right’. The illegal immigrants only get £49 a week in taxpayers’ cash while their claim for asylum is being checked. It is true that in the meantime they are getting lots of freebies at the taxpayers’ expense and, no doubt, some of them are working in the black economy (great for their ‘employers’ who won’t be paying minimum wage and won’t be paying any National Insurance or taxes for people that do not exist). It should also be pointed out that since the record day of Channel crossings on 3rd June, there had been zero boat crossings for a week (bad weather in the Channel; went largely unreported by the ‘far Right’ mainstream media) until two boats with 120 high skill workers arrived this morning.
Any judge in their right mind would have denied Loony Lucy's appeal ... advocating and encouraging Gammon types to set fire to buildings housing people? ... silly bitch ...
