My phone doesn’t show post numbers so I don’t know what this means, but it wasn’t in the one I read And I’m now totally lost if you don’t know the point of your post either, but let’s move on All I can say is that all managers have to bear with injuries, and I do think we have been particularly unlucky for quite a few seasons in terms of key injuries. I’m unconvinced by the notion that left back is quite so important, but I agree that multiple injuries to left backs doesn’t help - much more important to my mind were suspensions of McLean and Sainz, and injury to Sargent I’m also not sure I can blame club management for “squad composition” on the left back topic - having two left backs and a centre back who can double seems like a very sensible squad composition, it’s just the misfortune of injuries that makes it look worse - but three left backs would be a waste of money It does come back to the big question mark over training and burden on players’ bodies though
All a load of squit to me!! The only stat that matters is the final score so why bother with the rest of the nonsense. Whilst I am at it - am I the only person who turns the sound off when watching matches on TV. If I watch a match at a ground - even a match where I know little about the teams - I don't have somebody sitting next to me saying ' Smith has passed to Jones ' so why do I need it on the tele? And when the stats person goes into overdrive so the commentator can tell me that this is the third player in the last 20 years to score twice after having a crap at half time I want to hurl something at the TV. Rant over!!
Try scrolling up 3 posts from the one you did read. With respect, I suggest you read the post you're replying to again. After which, yes, let's move on.
Good lord you are unbelievably unpleasant. If you don’t write coherently, don’t get in a huff when I point out it’s incoherent.
