Thought VAR would overturn that. He caught him but just toed the ball first. Not one of those who think that just because he touched the ball it can’t be a penalty. In my view if he doesn’t divert the ball enough to stop the attacker continuing with the ball and then takes him out it is a penalty.
Don’t understand why the penalty wasn’t reviewed. Thought Henderson had left his line before ball was struck.
his foot was in the air so from the angle they show, it would be hard to tell whether his foot was level with the line
Man City is a hard watch all that possession (80%) but far too slow with tippy tappy football need to get the ball upfront a lot quicker