It was a really bad one, I can’t believe it wasn’t a red. It was proper studs up unlike Romero’s was. Wouldn’t be surprised if tomorrow night Romero gets a red for something a lot less!
Why should Liverpool's goal have been disallowed? It would have been offside years ago but not on the current rules.
I didn't watch it but I've seen the Tarkowski foul and Jota offside decision. What should he have been sent off for, though? Not seen it mentioned anywhere.
Liverpools goal should be disallowed for offside but based on the current offside laws, correct decision Id say. Definitely a red to tarkowski though. To be fair to the ref, he did get the ball first so may not have looked as bad as it was live. Shocker from VAR to not send him to the monitor though.
Kevin De Bruyne is to leave Man City at the end of the season to sign for his boyhood club: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cj3x0jpmgv4o Which side is that? Whoever offers him the most money, of course.
VVD gets away with murder on the pitch, he is almost immune from red cards, gets away with deliberate elbows, raking studs down calves, cynically stopping counter attacks etc etc. It`s purely down to benefit of doubt and weak as slash referees, who are afraid of the inevitable month long shiete storm that will follow should they give game changing decisions against Varpool.
Such a boring argument Liverpool had two massive decisions go against them against Everton. They were rightly debated afterwards
Chelsea are set to be fined by UEFA for vast overspending. They spent too much money so you're going to... make them spend more money?
