You're completely clueless. Your idea of peace = give russia whatever they want. That's not peace. You'd have been a valuable German asset in WW2
Ukraine wanted to fight. They don't want to be russian. russia would have raped/pillaged their country and destroyed Ukrainian identity, just as they're doing in occupied territories. You look at it from one side (russia's). I look at it from both sides. This is the difference. You're completely ****ing clueless. russian soldiers openly share horrific videos of torture/rape/etc... of civilians. I wouldn't want them invading my country either, and Ukraine has plenty of past experience of it.
You see it from both sides? So you agree that Eastern Ukraine was under attack from their own government both culturally and militarily, there was a coup that overthrew the legitimate government of Ukraine and Russia have a right to feel worried about their security as NATO increases its militarily alliance against them? Why are you arguing with me then?
I look at the conflict from both sides. I look at what's reported. It makes it much easier to see the lies. You've just regurgitated a whole list of russian propaganda talking points. As I've said many times, you're completely ****ing clueless. You don't care about people dying, if you did you'd want russia to **** off out of Ukraine.
It's notable that the stopped reporting their "deportations" when they realised most but the extremely gullible could see straight through their bullshit and lies.
From what I have read, the Leicester woman in the photo was advertising her snatch because she had not bothered to wear any knickers and she was in her twenties at the time. It has been kicking around on the internet thirty years after it was originally taken. Her growler is probably not in good nick thirty years later after too many visitors. Now the woman is famous (a reality TV nobody – had to Google it as I had never heard of her) and somebody famous shared it she wants them prosecuted. Will the Metropolitan Police be arresting any of the other people who have been sharing the photo online for years, like the photographer? I doubt it very much as it seems that it took them nearly a year to bring this one case.
Lots of us ‘fiddled’ our taxes. I avoided paying the 40% income tax rate for more than a decade and a half by working through a limited company and paying the money as dividends not PAYE. So it seems that your definition of ‘Shysters’ is people who look at the stupidity of the system and find ways to work around it.
How many times will the incompetent Chancellor use the word “growth” during the Spring Statement? Rachel from Accounts should go to Lending Stream. They only charge 1,274% APR for short term loans. She only needs the loan until the Budget as Stalin will get rid of her after she has delivered the next disaster. The loonies have already overshot the Office for Budget Responsibility’s forecast for borrowing by £23bn and are having to borrow to pay the debt interest – borrowing to pay for borrowing insanity. The October tax rises do not even take effect until April so there is more bad news to come...
Would you post a picture of up a woman’s skirt or dress, of her genitalia on your social media? Especially without her permission, either way is it not a creepy as **** thing to do is it not? He’s clearly a danger to women.
Given she also posted the picture (that Fox never took), is she a danger to women too? Aren't you the one that kept screen grabbed pictures of Dunc's kids off here, or was that one of the other lefty weirdos?
Fox is an utter **** . I wouldn’t do the thing he did (to be fair I wouldn’t do the majority of stupid **** he does ). However , his lawyer must be ****e as that picture is in the public domain . He did post it for one reason , to intimidate her , but he no worse - in this situation - than the scummy paps that took the picture .
