As does being blinded by being wrong! I suggest you take off your tiger tinted glasses & see it as it is!
Funnily enough this other Joao Pedro attempted a viscous elbow, clearly only with intent to injure because what other intention did he have doing that? please log in to view this image The referee said it wasn’t a red card VAR checked it and agreed it wasn’t a red card It was then reviewed after the game and still decided it wasn’t a red card or worthy of a retrospective ban.
Given he pulled his legs out of the way midway through the tackle, clearly the intent was to not make the tackle. It's like someone raising their fist in the air and feigning to throw a punch
Oh – how awful of you. How simply terrible and narrow minded of you not to just blanket condemn Pedro and be gladdened that he’s been banned for three games. What Pedro did was the equivalent of pretending to shoot someone with a real gun, but then aiming just above their heads for kicks. You obviously can’t see anything beyond your Tiger tinted deluxe sunglasses - disgraceful behaviour for a Hull City forum.
Rumour is he was snorting white powder off Amber in the changing rooms while waiting for all his candles to be lit.
