Lee Harvey Oswald, bought the rifle, gun powder residue, fled the scene his work place, shot a policeman for nothing, hated capitalism.
My guess - we'll never know. I think the CIA info will change less than people think. It's like there's some expectation that there's a letter saying "I DID IT" from Elvis Presley or a CIA payment to Lee Harvey Oswald. There's almost certainly not. According to the CIA themselves in recent years have already released 95%+ of all the documents they have about it and have stated that they have no other information about certain things (they have already released all documents about Lee Harvey Oswald for instance) - obviously they could be lying about that but why bother? Why would current people in the CIA lie about documentation they have - which is due to be released in the coming years anyway (2027 I think) - to protect people who are long dead? Also, there's going to be sensitive information which cannot be released (some peoples names but mostly information about things that are still used and/or sensitive) so when the information released isn't that interesting AND has bits still redacted in it then the conspiracy theories will still gain strength.
Lee Harvey Oswald has means, motive, opportunity. The circumstances which landed Harvey the job at the Texas book depository where too convoluted and coincidental to have been planned by the CIA or FBI. He actually DID flee the scene and shoot a police officer who wanted him for questioning, that aspect of the case is always ignored. He open fired on someone who wanted to talk to him after the assassination. Oswald is 100% guilty.
The book depository window Oswald fired from was directly above JFK, it was in fact closer to JFK with a better angle than the Trump shooter was. The Trump shooter was also using an assault rifle, not a sniper rifle. please log in to view this image
You'd have also noted how smaller the area is in real life compared to what we saw on camera. Meaning the multiple shooters theory is a load of old rubbish
