But what if we sign him and he doesn’t score? If he’s in the players union then we’ll struggle to fire him.
I must admit with all the minutes under his belt and goals scored since he left I'm gutted about that! Or has is he fully recovered and scoring goals in Monty world? Wouldn't swap him for Isidor or Mayenda these days! P.S Isidor isn't ours to swap but is he was. And aye the striker thing is going to get brought up every week we don't win by this poster called @monty987. Not sure ifnyou have heard of him? Loves a good moan he does and babbles incoherent stuff about strikers that we should be signing even when they are either a. Unrealistic or b. In worse form than what we have amd probably not got the same potential!
Ah ****e. Never mind. If Mundle is actually going to be nursed back to fitness this season, I honestly would go back for Clarke on loan. Only a loan though, no obligation. Mundle/Watson are still my first choice pairing going forward, but if Clarke was available, we'd be stupid not to try.
I used to be against it but the more news about Mundle that comes out, the more I think this would be a great idea
They won’t want to recall him unless they’ve agreed a deal elsewhere which makes it likely they are looking for a permanent deal or not interested in selling. He’s playing regularly so as loans go it’s perfect if they intend to keep him and assess in the summer.
Celtic are in for him now. Could see the appeal there with European football and half decent chance of going through
I wonder how much the bid was. Would take serious cash to get him out of Villa, especially in January