They hardly ever go back and give them a card these days, it was good refereeing to allow the advantage but its a bit of a shocker down his achillies.
All depends really, my opinion is that Kane needs 2 runners to go beyond him for when he drops deep and I'm not sure we have them. I think there's enough games where both can get a lot of game time though
hmm, not sure I agree there. Ball hitting hand has dramatically altered the outcome of that transition. I can see why its been given but I think its harsh on spurs
Depends if Kane can actually run these days. Looked like father time caught up to him in the last competition.
Ball hitting hand isn’t an offence unless the hand is the person who scores the goal. If the person it hits doesn’t score, the ref can only decide if it’s deliberate or not. this clearly wasn’t deliberate. Its the rules whether it’s fair or not.
People want consistency from refs yet still think refs should interpret things differently to the rules…
you do you. I thought I’d try and explain it to you like you thought you needed to explain to me how boxing scoring works
Surely the law should be, if an attacker gains an advantage (especially a goal being scored) from a handball, whether its deliberate or not, then the goal should be chalked off?