Being America it's on a bigger scale, but here's an example of the organised agitators. It's very similar in many parts of the west, and was seen at recent events in the UK and the question of who funds it can be an interesting rabbit hole. There is no equivalent on the mythical right wing.
https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/sahel-the-new-front-in-the-ukraine-russia-war Ukraine...supporting Jihadists in Mali There's that terrorist link again
Those that should won't listen to this, but it gives a reasonable insight into why the narrative in the mainstream media is framed as it is, and doesn't represent reality. Some people still cling to their favoured sources, despite there being so many ways to look for the raw truth.
QED, and so quickly too. It's interesting to see that some find boring little DMD a more interesting topic than world events and politics. #transparentandpredictableasfuck
The British state has a long and inglorious history of using draconian methods to keep the people in line. These excessive sentences being handed down to "rioters" and " Facebook felons" is nothing new. It's what they do, it's what they've always done. It's just too bad they don't have any colonies left where the baddies can all be shipped and used as slave labour. When you have senior police officers saying that baying mobs of brown skinned people roaming about English city centres armed to the teeth are left to police themselves whilst white skinned people face riot police and big dogs with sharp teeth then it's hard to deny there is, at least, a two tier policing policy at work on these islands. Truth be told, the Police know they can't police our Muslim communities, that horse has already bolted.
Par for the course tbh. *****philes have always been protected by the British establishment. They look after their own.
The Times are posting misinformation aimed at sullying the image of a brave campaigner for the rights of women and victims of rape. Shameful, but sadly just another example of the slide to the gutter from the mainstream media. Without twitter, they'd get away with this sort of thing.
Anyone that has watched this got any views on the content, or will it just be the usual personal ****e from people that haven't bothered to watch it? My view is, it's damning if true, and I've looked for the debunking, and found little that changed the core narrative. The main opposition seems to be centred around claims that Robinson knows the lads family.
