**** knows. Probably be undisclosed through official channels, so it's Baz's word against their press isn't it? Would think both parties will spin it in their clubs favour though. Hence the reported difference.
They don't matter really, if fans care that much about the value of the deal then one figure that we're definitely getting should suffice. I never understood the whole "a three year deal with the option of a fourth". Well, what's the option for? If you want to give the player a new contract, give them one. If after three years you aren't sure if they should get a contract or not, you probably should let them go. Because how often is an option triggered just to squeeze money out of potential buyers? Is it not more profitable to accept an offer before the contract runs out?
I was a teenager at the time and naturally thought that this exotic import goalie must be ace. Turned out he was no better than Matt Duke and barely ever even made the bench. If it was today there'd be a huge clamour for him to play because Boaz not commanding his area is costing us points, or something.
The whole year option thing seemed to be one of Ehab's favourite tricks. Don't remember it being as prominent prior.
According to the EFL website, no domestic games will be available on iFollow or club's own streaming sites, but the streaming overseas of games will continue.
Either that, or just the way deals are structured are simply becoming more complex and relevant to ffp than before. But if you can't get your head around it than it's not my problem.
thanks that seems the same as last year. I contacted the Club to clarify I got an immediate response and they put me in touch with the Clubs Stream Support [email protected]
