How will all this work with the new rules ? It's going squad cost ratio and anchoring..is it both rules all 3 rules or just one?.. I don't get it.
The way it’s reported. let’s say your Man City and earn £1bn a year. You can spend £850m that season on transfers, wages and agents fees. however if you were a smallish club like Luton and you only earn £100m you can only spend £85m a year on transfers, wages and agents fees. depending on which is lower X 5
I can grasp it. I just don’t really think it’s the right thing to do. You shouldn’t have to sell your best players to buy players. I just don’t like the rules.
SCCR and Anchoring will be in place as a trial next season, hence non-binding. PSR will remain the enforced ruleset. SCCR and Anchoring should replace PSR the following season. How it works: SCCR applies 1st, Anchoring second. SCCR: In Europe: Clubs are allowed to spend up to 75% of their commercial, match day and media revenues, plus profit from player trading. On wages and amortised transfer fees for manager and players and agent fees Not in Europe: Clubs are allowed to spend up to 85% of their commercial, match day and media revenues, plus profit from player trading. On wages and amortised transfer fees for manager and players and agent fees. Anchoring: Clubs are not allowed to spend more than a multiple of the bottom clubs tv revenue. This is likely to only affect Man City but possibly Man Utd and Chelsea as well.
Oh, interesting. So this means our ceiling has been effectively removed. When you consider our bigger spending drops off 1st July, and we have significant profits up to this date, we could go on a mad spree in Jul/Aug. Interesting. ATP dictates how mad we can go. If City win that, we can sell a load of rights for big bucks, and be able to spend up to, what, £500m?!
It's all about the commercial revenue in essence. If we can increase ours through unhindered associated party sponsorship to Man City like levels then we would be caught by anchoring.in the PL and by sccr in Europe. I suspect City will lose the legal case as you have to agree to abide by PL regulations to be accepted into the league. Therefore, unless the rules are very poorly written, City have agreed to abide by the rules which are accepted by a majority of clubs in the AGM votes.
Here is my question because 5.1 x 103 million would have been the amount this season. I don't understand how that works alongside the squad cost ratio ****e. It isn't going to be the ability to spend 500 million that's for sure.
Apply sccr to the revenues 1st. If that comes to more than the multiple of the bottom clubs tv revenue then anchoring kicks in
It's likely a reduction in spending power for Man City, marginal for Man Utd and Chelsea and the rest of the league is no where near having enough revenue to have anchoring kick in
The £100million would be less any remaining amortisation on sold players contract. Imperative that a player you buy performs as his actual sales value could fall quicker than his amortisation rate. You could end up with a player you don't want to continue paying but selling him will have a negative effect on your PSR calculation.
