I think you will find it is a blow your socks off moment and that's the announcement and not the coffee.
I once had Iranian coffee and that DID blow my socks off. Should have been covered by the 1971 Misuse of drugs act it was that strong.
Suggested by Baz. Syd's being overly dramatic again. There's a difference between an owner sacking a manager for not playing certain players and the suggestion that signing players and not using them to full potential (such as Jacob playing ahead of Giles when we need goals to get wins) will cause some consternation and potential friction in the boardroom. If I'd put 24m in building a squad, pushing the boat out in Jan only to drop a position and not improve on it, I'd be asking questions. Especially when I saw significant investments either used minimally, sat on the bench or being dropped from the squad altogether.
But the massive swings between sublime football and being useless characterised our whole season right up to the last couple of games with Ipswich and Plymouth. As mentioned, we lost more games at home than the previous season and a large proportion of those games were boring and/or an exercise in cluelessness in attack. Acun sat through all those games and was obviously concerned that a full MKM wouldn't be guaranteed in the future as paying customers drifted away. I like Liam but can see absolutely why Acun was concerned about the future.
I think now Acun has put some meat on the bones we can understand his thinking, even if many of us don't necessarily think it's the right decision on balance.
The owner wants attacking football and doesn't mind if we lose 5-4 That's fine but I do wonder why he appointed Rosenior in the first place then
You’ve never embellished the truth in a job interview before? I don’t think when Acun spoke to Rosenior about entertaining football being one of the things he’s looking for in a coach, Liam said ‘oh, well I coach boring football but we will have the most touches in our own half in the league!’.
