Maybe you need to go back to my first post on the analytics and read from there. Hint - it's a reply to Sour Patch. This is exactly what I mean about assumptions.
54% of your posts are positive? go and lie down man, counting them would be insane, and working it out
Christ on a bike I'll put you out of your misery. I pulled 54% out of my arse to demonstrate that statistics with no context are meaningless and you can't prove anything with them. If you'd read what led up to that, you'd have understood it, but instead you're getting more and more engaged about a made up stat.
Maybe you should stick your head up your arse instead of making up ****? And you seem to think I am angry I havnt ignored you, you are are an entertaining negative bastard
Carry on liar Carry on Mr Misery About time we had someone bring that franchise back. Can I be Mr why on earth did i bother please?
Crikey, you pull 54% out of your arse and try to ridicule me ? crack on with your running down of the club I think I am spoiling this thread, I will leave you to cast your negativity
Drifting back to the tfr window. Talking to a Barnsley lad today, seen most of Styles games. I am a fan of Styles, full transparency. This lad was a bit half hearted on him. Says he had a brilliant season at one point, in a lwb role drifting into the middle, but since then has been in and out. Can be the real deal, or can be anonymous his words. He is a sound lad so fair dos. Time will tell. I think he needs to play in the middle, and he did say that is where Styles wants to play. Lets see. He did say the £2m would be welcome for them, but wouldnt be surprised if he were an £6m player in a year either.
I have a friend, Cris, who's a Liverpool supporter, one of his kids is going to Dallas with Chelsea this month. He was talking to one of the Chelsea coaches recently and said he was at the play-off final with Sunderland and other games with me. Cris was saying he'd been impressed with the young lads and how quickly they've developed. The Chelsea lad said 'Sunderland are printing money, anyone they sign immediately becomes worth another million from what they've paid!' I'm now sitting back and considering what he said, could he be right? I always default to Trai Hume who, if you apply that formula, is worth a million ... ... I doubt anyone could argue with that tbh.
Much better that individual posters can be called out and the narrative driven. No worse or better than otr in my opinion
Give it a rest Chunks man, do you have to drag everything out for weeks. I said you were being negative, you said you weren't ... ... I've not mentioned it since, get over it.
First post in a week and in you jump. Could have posted my history and seen maybe 10 or so posts in a year where I was vaguley negative, but you called me out for no real reason. But yes, that's me dragging it out for weeks. Maybe you could accept you where in the wrong to name posters and try and lead the narrative, but you won't
