Transfer Rumours transfer thread fact and fiction

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
So I take it you’re not happy with signing Dragusin for £30m plus a player on loan then? Seeing as he’s 21 and only had one full season with a midtable Serie A club.

Assume van de Ven shouldn’t have been signed either.

VdV is a bit different because he had played plenty of men’s football before he even ended up at Wolfsburg. He was clearly going to be ready to physically stand up to the PL, Dragusin has less of a body of work but the eye test at least says the same. Physically ready. Gil has never looked that and that’s why he was so much more of a risk. Players have to play to adapt and improve and Gil was always going to struggle for consistent minutes when he wasn’t physically ready.

Again it comes down to planning. Adaptation for Gil was always going to take more than simply sticking him in the gym for a few months. I have much more confidence in Dragusin because he looks a big unit and Serie A is a league with some very physical players in there, who he seems to stand up to, according to some reports I’ve read at least.
 
Would prefer it to be an obligation.

Disappointed it’s not worked out for him, talent is without a doubt there but England just maybe ain’t the right country for him.

Solomon is said to be back training soon too according to Dan KP so that’s great news but further puts emphasis on trying to get Gil out, as he won’t get on the pitch when Solomon returns, will struggle as it is once Werner is (soon) in.
Interestingly, I have the same sort of reservations about Solomon as you have about Gil.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KingHotspur
The exciting thing is it looks like the management at Spurs realises, like we all do, that Ange is a special fit for Tottenham and they realise they have to back him properly. Our squad is looking in better shape than it has for a long time. Our manager wants to entertain and the winning will follow that.
 
Didn’t really do much at Fulham though.

As a emergency backup and squad filler he’s ok but you’d hope he wouldn’t be needed over a long period of time
Worst case scenario with Solomon is we sell him for pure profit in the summer

Worst case scenario with Gil is...well TBH the worst case scenario isn't going to happen, as there's interest in him which wasn't the case when we were trying to get David Bentley off the books
 
You make a good point and I'm not going to sit here nitpicking the differences between their career paths and Gil's. One very important difference worth mentioning is that they were both 2 years older when we signed them. I know that doesn't sound like much but imo in the modern game 21-22 yo is roughly when you can tell whether or not a player has "it". Which is why it is pretty clear that the likes of Tanganga, Skipp and Sessegnon sadly don't.

But in principle I agree with you. We have paid the price of making signings from a position of total desperation and have consequently paid significantly over the odds for two players because we were and are desperate after neglecting that position for years. We shouldn't have snookered ourselves in the first place but now that we have, we can only hope and pray that Radu will be another Micky and not another Cheery Cheese. So yes, it's a huge gamble and even a player like Micky who is clearly good, to turn a significant profit on an investment that could reach £46m, he'd have to grow into one of the best defenders in the entire world.

The reason I'm more supportive of these gambles is as mentioned - we are desperate. By contrast we weren't at all desperate for a player of Gil's profile as we already had Bergwijn, Lucas, Son and Lamela himself for the wide positions, which crucially made it a wholly unnecessary gamble and it is therefore no surprise that it has flopped.

Generally agree with most of that, with the last paragraph aside. Saying we had Lucas and Lamela as reasons for not really needing Gil isn’t entirely accurate in my opinion.

Many had wanted to sell Lucas whilst everyone knew Lamela wasn’t reliable with his fitness and I think the club had had enough too, hence putting him into the Gil deal, as we were never gonna get a fee for a player as injury prone as he was. These were two players that didn’t have considerable futures at the club and were highly inconsistent as well, especially the Brazilian, despite having the ability to change the game with moments of magic.

I could be wrong too but I think the club may have seen Gil as a potential Son successor, it clearly hasn’t turned out as so but I’m not angry at the decision to try, eventually we’re gonna have to try again but Sonny is still coming up with the goods and hopefully will for a few more years yet.
 
VdV is a bit different because he had played plenty of men’s football before he even ended up at Wolfsburg. He was clearly going to be ready to physically stand up to the PL, Dragusin has less of a body of work but the eye test at least says the same. Physically ready. Gil has never looked that and that’s why he was so much more of a risk. Players have to play to adapt and improve and Gil was always going to struggle for consistent minutes when he wasn’t physically ready.

Again it comes down to planning. Adaptation for Gil was always going to take more than simply sticking him in the gym for a few months. I have much more confidence in Dragusin because he looks a big unit and Serie A is a league with some very physical players in there, who he seems to stand up to, according to some reports I’ve read at least.

He’d only played in the second tier of Dutch football though prior to the move to Wolfsburg. Gil had played in La Liga as well as making his senior debut for Spain.

As I’ve said to CK, the deal obviously hasn’t worked out and with hindsight we’d obviously go back and cancel it if we could but I think there was sound reasoning for us signing a player like Gil. Things pointed towards him being a future star for club and country, he may still even turn out as such with the right career move.

I’d happily gamble on 50 more Gil’s for instance than immediately waste money on a Richarlison.
 
We now have the squad we should have had when Harry was here.

Agree, it’s getting very exciting. Having gone through a number of years practically wanting to gouge my eyes out watching so many awful players, we’ve now got a lot of aesthetically pleasing ones, I could watch the likes of van de Ven, Udogie, Porro, Sarr, Bentancur, Maddison, Sonny, Kulu etc all day long, Vicario is also similar to watching prime Lloris too.

Ironically the one weak point is indeed his Harry’s old position. Maybe he’ll fancy a quick reunion in the summer?!
 
A little bonus in signing Dragusin that Rob Guest has just mentioned is that he can be named on our U21 list for registration so won’t count towards the non-HG quota this season.
 
First the bad news: Dragusin;s gobshite ex-agent has popped up again

And now the good news: He's giving credit to Levy & Lange for staying up to 3 o'clock this morning to get the Dragusin deal done - which presumably explains why the plane that brought him over was booked at 4am
 
He’d only played in the second tier of Dutch football though prior to the move to Wolfsburg. Gil had played in La Liga as well as making his senior debut for Spain.

As I’ve said to CK, the deal obviously hasn’t worked out and with hindsight we’d obviously go back and cancel it if we could but I think there was sound reasoning for us signing a player like Gil. Things pointed towards him being a future star for club and country, he may still even turn out as such with the right career move.

I’d happily gamble on 50 more Gil’s for instance than immediately waste money on a Richarlison.

I obviously take the point but I guess what I’m saying is that when you compare him to Gil, it’s about the physical development of a player at that age as much as it is the level they’re playing at. VdV was ready for the PL, Gil wasn’t and isn’t, and he’s far from the first and won’t be the last player to be technically sound but unable to cope with the pace and physicality.

But I agree we had sound reasons to sign him, I just think that expecting him to integrate straight into the PL at his age and stage of development was a massive mistake, which is clearly what the club wanted from him.
 
Didn’t really do much at Fulham though.

As a emergency backup and squad filler he’s ok but you’d hope he wouldn’t be needed over a long period of time

Agreed which is why he was a good pickup on a free. Wouldn’t have been a player I’d have been keen on the club investing a transfer fee in.

I was referring to their footballing ability and potential. Not their economic value or cost in terms of work for the backroom staff.

I think that’s the point though. Solomon and Gil ultimately have the same role in the team as backup wingers - one cost nothing, has a couple of years more experience including CL football, and has played in England, the other cost upwards of 30m and had comparatively much less experience even allowing for the fact he’s a couple of years younger.

FWIW I think Gil has a lot of potential to be a good Ange winger and I’m not upset that we signed him back in the day but he’s never going to meet that potential if we keep managing him as we have. He needs a loan in a more physical, direct team and league so he can work on those aspects of his game. Loaning him back to Spain constantly isn’t doing him any favours.