it is a Football Association competition the PL teams just happen to be invited as are all clubs under the FA umbrella .They are the ones who set out the criteria *Well they said it would require PL clubs to agree to change venues. That normally would require a meeting of some form or another.
it is a Football Association competition the PL teams just happen to be invited as are all clubs under the FA umbrella .They are the ones who set out the criteria *
*though i accept pressure from "bigger" clubs has led to changes though that is partially down to the ridiculous fixture congestion these days with now a third of PL playing in europe
it is a Football Association competition the PL teams just happen to be invited as are all clubs under the FA umbrella .They are the ones who set out the criteria *
*though i accept pressure from "bigger" clubs has led to changes though that is partially down to the ridiculous fixture congestion these days with now a third of PL playing in europe
You're a nice guy folders I realised that when I gave you a light sabre and you didn't kill anyone for 3 nights.
Just don't see how the hell the FA - which lets face it, is weaker than most PL clubs these days - are going to dictate to these owners that they will be losing gate revenues and expect to get away with it.
Without the owners consent, and without the PL clubs, the competition would become nothing more than the Pizza cup or whatever its called these days.
I feel that the clubs at the top end do have a responsibility though towards the clubs in the lower leagues.it is a Football Association competition the PL teams just happen to be invited as are all clubs under the FA umbrella .They are the ones who set out the criteria *
*though i accept pressure from "bigger" clubs has led to changes though that is partially down to the ridiculous fixture congestion these days with now a third of PL playing in europe
Isn't it the FA's Premier league?Just don't see how the hell the FA - which lets face it, is weaker than most PL clubs these days - are going to dictate to these owners that they will be losing gate revenues and expect to get away with it.
Without the owners consent, and without the PL clubs, the competition would become nothing more than the Pizza cup or whatever its called these days.
Isn't it the FA's Premier league?

Their youth team might.Johnston's Paint Trophy, you'll never win that![]()
They have an overall veto over everything.Not when they don't own a single share certificate![]()
Their youth team might.

Forgot about that crock of ****. We won it when still worth winning
Has a yoof side reached a final yet?
They have an overall veto over everything.
No, but we've won every game so far. That has meant Moyes being branded a **** for not playing the youth in the first team, as obviously beating weakened L2 teams means they're ready.Forgot about that crock of ****. We won it when still worth winning
Has a yoof side reached a final yet?
No, but we've won every game so far. That has meant Moyes being branded a **** for not playing the youth in the first team, as obviously beating weakened L2 teams means they're ready.
no, it's the style. They do have a point, it's pretty bland football, but as we've beaten Spurs, Arsenal, Chelsea and United, sit 6th and have a trophy, they're looking like miserable ****s that can't change their views because... Personally I don't give a **** if we have 1% possession if we continues doing thattbh.Your fan base is rather odd tbf. Beat Arsenal away but then a draw v Brighton isn't good enough.
Fair play - I am box office, after all...
... and quite frankly, anybody with more likes than posts on here has to be a reet arse licking twàt innit ... don't post on here to make fwends, you soft ****s ...
... oh and world peace ...
Bumps manJust common sense to me
The lower league can then base their choice on things like financial benefit - great day out - that sort of thing
No brainer for me