I was right. Braverman, in a few months, has had to resign then been sacked ... ... I don't think Mowbray has ever had that on his CV
I think he is a whore, he criticised the last world cup before he got there, and said **** all, when over ther and raked in the money All about £££££S for the crisp munching ****er
She was absolutely useless and is now blaming Sunak for being useless ... ... to be fair he jumped at the chance to employ her so she may be right
As I've said, throughout this thread, I can't abide him ... ... that doesn't mean he was wrong about Braverman or wrong with this tweet.
TBH no idea what he said about Braverman, MPs are all just chasing ££££££££££££££££, I would shoot all of the ****ers, from either party
There’s obviously a lot of dislike for MPs. What if we got rid of them all? Then we became the MPs… I would genuinely like to know, what would you do differently? I’m a left-leaning fellow so would probably try to help those who are struggling and give a hand up to people. The country would be bankrupt in a year or two, mind.
I think we as a country are ****ed regardless, I wouldnt mind being able to sack them and remove any pension rights for any misdemeaners
He is in negotiation to extend his contract. All the BBC , if they had the balls, is to tell him that he is out along with his cronies.
I read with horror today that BBC are lining up Jermain ****ing Jenas as Lineker's eventual replacement on MOTD. **** me. That would be the end of the show
Why was she rightly sacked? That's your opinion. I believe she was MOSTLY right. A lot of people for instance do choose that "lifestyle" to live in tents. Everyone is eligible for a council house or flat. I totally get that alot of people do not choose that lifestyle tho
Being eligible for one is a world away from actually getting one though. Is choosing to "live" in a tent, as opposed to sleeping outside really a lifestyle choice? I know which one of the two I would choose, but it certainly wouldn't be a "lifestyle" choice.
Anyone seeing anything different post the current **** show is seeing things I cant. Look back and really ask have any of these two parties have been any good. In my opinion they havent and it comes down to how we elect MPs. Labour are doing a btilliant job at the minute of stopping people that might not agree with Starmer, being able to represent anyone. Ask yourself this. Why should a lawyer be a great leader of a country? Or be a home secretary. Or journalits (ahem) hold a position of power. These jonny come lately politicians arent fit for purpose. Honestly, why would they want a £120k a year gig? Top business people earn 10 times plus, and they are far more qualified to head up a multi faceted and complicated organisation. Maybe we need to revert to a local election, where voting for your local rep is worthwhile because they will fight for you, not a cultish party leader. And have an org at the top that are serious leaders of organisations, not folk who will be PM and then be off to make millions afterwards. Johnson will never be short of a speaking event, Blair has made millions. Are either good for our country. Not for me. Change is needed or we continue to repeat the same old nonsense. The current govt are a shambles, as were the last labour govt, and the tory one before that. We are just gullible fools if we keep flip flopping between each.
Why was she rightly sacked? That's your opinion. I believe she was MOSTLY right. A lot of people for instance do choose that "lifestyle" to live in tents. Everyone is eligible for a council house or flat. I totally get that alot of people do not choose that lifestyle tho So you're telling me...or implying that all homeless people don't want to be homeless?
